Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
CCD surface photometry of elliptical galaxies - I. Observations, reduction and results
1987506 citationsR. JędrzejewskiMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Societyprofile →
Citations per year, relative to R. Jędrzejewski R. Jędrzejewski (= 1×)
peers
Walter Jaffe
Countries citing papers authored by R. Jędrzejewski
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of R. Jędrzejewski's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by R. Jędrzejewski with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites R. Jędrzejewski more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by R. Jędrzejewski. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by R. Jędrzejewski. The network helps show where R. Jędrzejewski may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of R. Jędrzejewski
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of R. Jędrzejewski.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of R. Jędrzejewski based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with R. Jędrzejewski. R. Jędrzejewski is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Jędrzejewski, R., et al.. (2005). MultiDrizzle: Automated Image Combination and Cosmic-Ray Identification Software. ASPC. 347. 129.
3.
Payne, H. E., R. Jędrzejewski, & R. N. Hook. (2003). Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems XII. ASPC. 295.156 indexed citations
4.
Hack, W., I. Busko, & R. Jędrzejewski. (2003). New STScI Data Analysis Applications. 295. 453.
5.
Mutchler, Max, et al.. (1999). ACS calibration pipeline testing: cosmic ray rejection. Applied Categorical Structures. 198(2). 9–109.
6.
Stiavelli, M., A. S. Fruchter, F. R. Boffi, et al.. (1998). Dithering strategies for ACS. Applied Categorical Structures. 2.1 indexed citations
7.
Casertano, Stefano, et al.. (1997). The 1997 HST Calibration Workshop with a New Generation of Instruments. NASA Technical Reports Server (NASA).71 indexed citations
Deharveng, J. M., R. Albrecht, C. Barbieri, et al.. (1994). The massive star content of the blue dwarf galaxy IZw 36 from Faint Object Camera observations. A&A. 288. 413–424.1 indexed citations
10.
Jędrzejewski, R., et al.. (1994). Hubble Space Telescope faint object camera instrument handbook (Post-COSTAR), version 5.0. Unknow.9 indexed citations
Jędrzejewski, R., G. Hartig, P. Jakobsen, James H. Crocker, & H. C. Ford. (1994). <title>On-orbit alignment of the FOC channel of COSTAR</title>. Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE. 2198. 1192–1201.2 indexed citations
15.
Jakobsen, P., P. Greenfield, & R. Jędrzejewski. (1992). The Cramér-Rao lower bound and stellar photometry with aberrated HST images. 253(1). 329–332.3 indexed citations
Jędrzejewski, R.. (1987). CCD surface photometry of elliptical galaxies - I. Observations, reduction and results. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 226(4). 747–768.506 indexed citations breakdown →
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.