Paul L. Schechter

15.5k total citations · 3 hit papers
118 papers, 8.7k citations indexed

About

Paul L. Schechter is a scholar working on Astronomy and Astrophysics, Instrumentation and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics. According to data from OpenAlex, Paul L. Schechter has authored 118 papers receiving a total of 8.7k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 106 papers in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 76 papers in Instrumentation and 21 papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics. Recurrent topics in Paul L. Schechter's work include Astronomy and Astrophysical Research (75 papers), Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena (70 papers) and Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies (54 papers). Paul L. Schechter is often cited by papers focused on Astronomy and Astrophysical Research (75 papers), Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena (70 papers) and Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies (54 papers). Paul L. Schechter collaborates with scholars based in United States, Germany and Chile. Paul L. Schechter's co-authors include William H. Press, J. Wambsganß, Stephen A. Shectman, Abhijit Saha, Mario Mateo, R. Kirshner, D. L. Tucker, Stephen D. Landy, H. Lin and Jr. Oemler A. and has published in prestigious journals such as The Astrophysical Journal, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society and The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series.

In The Last Decade

Paul L. Schechter

112 papers receiving 8.5k citations

Hit Papers

Formation of Galaxies and Clusters of Galaxies by Self-Si... 1974 2026 1991 2008 1974 1976 1993 1000 2.0k 3.0k

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Paul L. Schechter United States 34 8.4k 3.4k 1.8k 617 536 118 8.7k
A. E. Evrard United States 42 9.9k 1.2× 4.0k 1.2× 2.6k 1.4× 717 1.2× 313 0.6× 113 10.5k
N. Kaiser United States 35 7.9k 0.9× 2.5k 0.8× 2.1k 1.1× 669 1.1× 230 0.4× 100 8.3k
Konrad Kuijken Netherlands 49 6.9k 0.8× 3.1k 0.9× 1.2k 0.6× 361 0.6× 671 1.3× 203 7.3k
Martha P. Haynes United States 53 9.4k 1.1× 4.6k 1.4× 1.3k 0.7× 426 0.7× 229 0.4× 239 9.7k
Marc Davis United States 44 14.6k 1.7× 5.6k 1.7× 2.5k 1.4× 531 0.9× 399 0.7× 96 15.0k
Dennis Zaritsky United States 48 8.6k 1.0× 4.2k 1.2× 1.3k 0.7× 316 0.5× 320 0.6× 227 8.9k
J. P. Huchra United States 61 13.3k 1.6× 5.4k 1.6× 2.8k 1.5× 874 1.4× 405 0.8× 249 13.9k
S. M. Faber United States 48 12.4k 1.5× 5.8k 1.7× 1.9k 1.0× 440 0.7× 529 1.0× 108 12.7k
F. Combes France 64 13.0k 1.5× 3.8k 1.1× 2.0k 1.1× 397 0.6× 679 1.3× 568 13.6k
S. Borgani Italy 56 10.1k 1.2× 3.9k 1.1× 2.6k 1.4× 537 0.9× 220 0.4× 231 10.4k

Countries citing papers authored by Paul L. Schechter

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Paul L. Schechter's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Paul L. Schechter with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Paul L. Schechter more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Paul L. Schechter

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Paul L. Schechter. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Paul L. Schechter. The network helps show where Paul L. Schechter may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Paul L. Schechter

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Paul L. Schechter. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Paul L. Schechter based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Paul L. Schechter. Paul L. Schechter is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Lemon, Cameron, F. Courbin, Anupreeta More, et al.. (2024). Searching for Strong Gravitational Lenses. Space Science Reviews. 220(2). 9 indexed citations
2.
3.
Anguita, T., et al.. (2024). Microlensing Near Macro-Caustics. Space Science Reviews. 220(5). 2 indexed citations
4.
Schechter, Paul L., et al.. (2024). A Malmquist-like Bias in the Inferred Areas of Diamond Caustics and Consequences for the Inferred Time Delays of Gravitationally Lensed Quasars. The Astrophysical Journal. 962(2). 108–108. 2 indexed citations
5.
Schechter, Paul L., et al.. (2024). Witt’s Hyperbola Is Both Predicted and Observed to Pass Close to the Lensing Galaxies in Quadruple Quasars. The Astrophysical Journal. 975(1). 62–62.
6.
Lemon, Cameron, T. Anguita, F. Courbin, et al.. (2022). Gravitationally lensed quasars in Gaia – IV. 150 new lenses, quasar pairs, and projected quasars. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 520(3). 3305–3328. 36 indexed citations
7.
Shajib, Anowar J., Adriano Agnello, P. R. Williams, et al.. (2021). High-resolution imaging follow-up of doubly imaged quasars. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 503(2). 1557–1567. 3 indexed citations
8.
Jaelani, Anton T., Cristian E. Rusu, Issha Kayo, et al.. (2021). Survey of Gravitationally Lensed Objects in HSC Imaging (SuGOHI) – VII. Discovery and confirmation of three strongly lensed quasars†. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 502(1). 1487–1493. 19 indexed citations
9.
Schechter, Paul L., et al.. (2021). "Worst-Case" Micro-Lensing in the Identification and Modeling of Lensed Quasars. arXiv (Cornell University). 14 indexed citations
10.
Schechter, Paul L., et al.. (2021). What Makes Quadruply Lensed Quasars Quadruple?. The Astrophysical Journal. 915(1). 4–4. 13 indexed citations
11.
Lucey, J. R., Russell J. Smith, Paul L. Schechter, A. S. Bosh, & S. E. Levine. (2018). A New Quadruple-image Gravitational Lens in an Edge-on Disk Galaxy at z = 0.0956. Research Notes of the AAS. 2(2). 62–62. 1 indexed citations
12.
Chehade, B., N. Metcalfe, T. Shanks, et al.. (2017). First Lensed Quasar Systems from the VST-ATLAS Survey: One Quad, Two Doubles, and Two Pairs of Lensless Twins. DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology). 27 indexed citations
13.
Macias, Phillip, Jerome A. Orosz, Charles D. Bailyn, et al.. (2011). A Refined Black Hole Mass for the X-ray Transient GRS 1009-45. AAS. 217. 1 indexed citations
14.
Fassnacht, C. D., et al.. (2004). Strong Lensing Studies with the LSST. American Astronomical Society Meeting Abstracts. 205.
15.
Wisotzki, L., Paul L. Schechter, D. O. Richstone, et al.. (2004). HE 0047-1756: A new gravitationally lensed double QSO. Astronomy and Astrophysics. 419(3). L31–L34. 28 indexed citations
16.
Schechter, Paul L., A. Udalski, M. K. Szymański, et al.. (2003). Microlensing of Relativistic Knots in the Quasar HE 1104−1805 AB. The Astrophysical Journal. 584(2). 657–663. 33 indexed citations
17.
Courbin, F., Prasenjit Saha, & Paul L. Schechter. (2002). Quasar Lensing. arXiv (Cornell University). 2 indexed citations
18.
Wisotzki, L., et al.. (2002). HE 0435-1223: A wide separation quadruple QSO and gravitational lens. Astronomy and Astrophysics. 395(1). 17–23. 58 indexed citations
19.
Chartas, G., Xinyu Dai, S. C. Gallagher, et al.. (2001). ChandraDetects a Rapid Flare in the Gravitationally Lensed Mini–Broad Absorption Line QSO RX J0911.4+0551. The Astrophysical Journal. 558(1). 119–126. 11 indexed citations
20.
Kirshner, R., A. Oemler, Paul L. Schechter, & Stephen A. Shectman. (1982). The Big Blank - Void in Space. Scientific American. 246(2). 75.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026