R. James Barbour

124 total papers · 2.5k total citations
57 papers, 1.8k citations indexed

About

R. James Barbour is a scholar working on Global and Planetary Change, Nature and Landscape Conservation and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics. According to data from OpenAlex, R. James Barbour has authored 57 papers receiving a total of 1.8k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 25 papers in Global and Planetary Change, 18 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation and 13 papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics. Recurrent topics in R. James Barbour's work include Forest Management and Policy (21 papers), Forest ecology and management (14 papers) and Fire effects on ecosystems (13 papers). R. James Barbour is often cited by papers focused on Forest Management and Policy (21 papers), Forest ecology and management (14 papers) and Fire effects on ecosystems (13 papers). R. James Barbour collaborates with scholars based in United States, Canada and United Kingdom. R. James Barbour's co-authors include Patrick G. Hatcher, John I. Hedges, Gregory L. Cowie, Hailin Wang, John R. Ertel, Lin Tian, Yong Yang, Mark C. Kuzyk, Victor Fiore and Robert Rowell and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature, Physical Review Letters and Journal of Applied Physics.

In The Last Decade

R. James Barbour

53 papers receiving 1.6k citations

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author Last Decade Papers Cites
R. James Barbour 631 444 338 325 269 57 1.8k
Simon Ellis 311 0.5× 364 0.8× 219 0.6× 196 0.6× 88 0.3× 111 2.0k
Matthias Schneider 414 0.7× 439 1.0× 185 0.5× 506 1.6× 19 0.1× 183 2.2k
Teruhisa Komatsu 135 0.2× 75 0.2× 216 0.6× 70 0.2× 86 0.3× 64 1.6k
Denise Blanc 117 0.2× 198 0.4× 104 0.3× 214 0.7× 267 1.0× 82 2.3k
David Mannes 96 0.2× 236 0.5× 93 0.3× 88 0.3× 428 1.6× 106 1.8k
Teresa Fonseca 882 1.4× 132 0.3× 606 1.8× 638 2.0× 13 0.0× 93 2.2k
Steffen Franke 579 0.9× 462 1.0× 875 2.6× 58 0.2× 24 0.1× 86 1.9k
Yair Zarmi 126 0.2× 62 0.1× 642 1.9× 406 1.2× 73 0.3× 98 2.1k
Wenhui Zhang 407 0.6× 114 0.3× 111 0.3× 110 0.3× 23 0.1× 119 1.7k
C. T. Chen 159 0.3× 226 0.5× 153 0.5× 201 0.6× 52 0.2× 70 2.3k

Countries citing papers authored by R. James Barbour

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of R. James Barbour's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by R. James Barbour with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites R. James Barbour more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by R. James Barbour

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by R. James Barbour. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by R. James Barbour. The network helps show where R. James Barbour may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of R. James Barbour

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of R. James Barbour. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of R. James Barbour based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with R. James Barbour. R. James Barbour is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Loading papers...

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026