Kenneth E. Skog

4.1k total citations
68 papers, 2.3k citations indexed

About

Kenneth E. Skog is a scholar working on Global and Planetary Change, Mechanics of Materials and Environmental Engineering. According to data from OpenAlex, Kenneth E. Skog has authored 68 papers receiving a total of 2.3k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 40 papers in Global and Planetary Change, 20 papers in Mechanics of Materials and 19 papers in Environmental Engineering. Recurrent topics in Kenneth E. Skog's work include Forest Management and Policy (39 papers), Forest Biomass Utilization and Management (20 papers) and Environmental Impact and Sustainability (19 papers). Kenneth E. Skog is often cited by papers focused on Forest Management and Policy (39 papers), Forest Biomass Utilization and Management (20 papers) and Environmental Impact and Sustainability (19 papers). Kenneth E. Skog collaborates with scholars based in United States, Sweden and Finland. Kenneth E. Skog's co-authors include Jessie A. Micales, Peter J. Ince, Linda S. Heath, James F. Morrison, Christopher W. Woodall, Elaine Oneil, Bruce Lippke, Leif Gustavsson, R. B. Harrison and Roger Sathre and has published in prestigious journals such as Environmental Science & Technology, Ecology and Energy Policy.

In The Last Decade

Kenneth E. Skog

65 papers receiving 2.1k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Kenneth E. Skog United States 24 1.4k 831 502 441 256 68 2.3k
Kim Pingoud Finland 22 1.1k 0.8× 940 1.1× 377 0.8× 431 1.0× 320 1.3× 51 1.9k
Bruce Lippke United States 22 901 0.7× 737 0.9× 351 0.7× 414 0.9× 189 0.7× 43 1.8k
Birger Solberg Norway 35 1.9k 1.4× 995 1.2× 488 1.0× 692 1.6× 348 1.4× 119 3.1k
Hannes Böttcher Austria 24 987 0.7× 741 0.9× 199 0.4× 273 0.6× 305 1.2× 55 2.7k
Robert C. Abt United States 24 1.3k 0.9× 308 0.4× 361 0.7× 464 1.1× 402 1.6× 83 1.7k
Antti Asikainen Finland 29 1.4k 1.1× 450 0.5× 350 0.7× 1.4k 3.2× 786 3.1× 137 2.4k
Dina Kruger United States 6 1.3k 0.9× 751 0.9× 609 1.2× 92 0.2× 166 0.6× 9 2.6k
Antti Kilpeläinen Finland 23 991 0.7× 297 0.4× 638 1.3× 290 0.7× 253 1.0× 73 1.6k
Blas Mola‐Yudego Finland 32 1.1k 0.8× 432 0.5× 443 0.9× 695 1.6× 840 3.3× 109 2.5k
Jianbang Gan United States 24 989 0.7× 253 0.3× 205 0.4× 395 0.9× 249 1.0× 83 1.8k

Countries citing papers authored by Kenneth E. Skog

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Kenneth E. Skog's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kenneth E. Skog with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kenneth E. Skog more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Kenneth E. Skog

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kenneth E. Skog. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kenneth E. Skog. The network helps show where Kenneth E. Skog may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Kenneth E. Skog

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Kenneth E. Skog. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Kenneth E. Skog based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Kenneth E. Skog. Kenneth E. Skog is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Nepal, Prakash, Karen L. Abt, Kenneth E. Skog, Jeffrey P. Prestemon, & Robert C. Abt. (2018). Projected Market Competition for Wood Biomass between Traditional Products and Energy: A Simulated Interaction of US Regional, National, and Global Forest Product Markets. Forest Science. 65(1). 14–26. 22 indexed citations
2.
Nepal, Prakash, Kenneth E. Skog, David B. McKeever, et al.. (2015). Carbon Mitigation Impacts of Increased Softwood Lumber and Structural Panel Use for Nonresidential Construction in the United States. Forest Products Journal. 66(1-2). 77–87. 35 indexed citations
3.
Bergman, Richard, Maureen Puettmann, Adam Taylor, & Kenneth E. Skog. (2014). The Carbon Impacts of Wood Products. Forest Products Journal. 64(7-8). 220–231. 122 indexed citations
4.
Nepal, Prakash, David N. Wear, & Kenneth E. Skog. (2014). Net change in carbon emissions with increased wood energy use in the United States. GCB Bioenergy. 7(4). 820–835. 19 indexed citations
5.
Goerndt, Michael E., Francisco X. Aguilar, & Kenneth E. Skog. (2013). Resource potential for renewable energy generation from co-firing of woody biomass with coal in the Northern U.S.. Biomass and Bioenergy. 59. 348–361. 27 indexed citations
6.
Nepal, Prakash, Peter J. Ince, Kenneth E. Skog, & Sun Joseph Chang. (2013). Projected US timber and primary forest product market impacts of climate change mitigation through timber set-asides. Canadian Journal of Forest Research. 43(3). 245–255. 7 indexed citations
7.
Halog, Anthony, et al.. (2012). Integrated Economic Equilibrium and Life Cycle Assessment Modeling for Policy‐based Consequential LCA. Journal of Industrial Ecology. 17(3). 375–384. 54 indexed citations
8.
Anderson, Nathaniel, Kenneth E. Skog, Sean P. Healey, et al.. (2012). Estimates of carbon stored in harvested wood products from the United States forest service northern region, 1906-2010. Carbon Balance and Management. 7(1). 1–1. 64 indexed citations
9.
Francisco, José da Cruz, et al.. (2012). EDIBLE WILD FRUITS OF MOZAMBIQUE. Acta Horticulturae. 223–228. 1 indexed citations
10.
Lippke, Bruce, Richard Gustafson, Richard A. Venditti, et al.. (2012). Comparing Life-Cycle Carbon and Energy Impacts for Biofuel, Wood Product, and Forest Management. 62(4). 247–257. 3 indexed citations
11.
Skog, Kenneth E., et al.. (2012). Forest-Based Biomass Supply Curves for the United States. Journal of Sustainable Forestry. 32(1-2). 14–27. 7 indexed citations
12.
Heath, Linda S., James E. Smith, Kenneth E. Skog, David J. Nowak, & Christopher W. Woodall. (2011). Managed Forest Carbon Estimates for the US Greenhouse Gas Inventory, 1990—2008. Journal of Forestry. 109(3). 167–173. 84 indexed citations
13.
Wegner, Theodore H., et al.. (2010). Uses and Desirable Properties of Wood in the 21st Century. Journal of Forestry. 108(4). 165–173. 22 indexed citations
14.
Heath, Linda S., et al.. (2010). Greenhouse Gas and Carbon Profile of the U.S. Forest Products Industry Value Chain. Environmental Science & Technology. 44(10). 3999–4005. 39 indexed citations
15.
Skog, Kenneth E.. (2008). Sequestration of carbon in harvested wood products for the United States. Forest Products Journal. 58(6). 56–72. 159 indexed citations
16.
Hovda, Knut Erik, Mari Asphjell Bjørnaas, Kenneth E. Skog, et al.. (2008). Acute poisonings treated in hospitals in Oslo: A one-year prospective study (I): Pattern of poisoning. Clinical Toxicology. 46(1). 35–41. 61 indexed citations
17.
Ellefson, Paul V., et al.. (2007). Organization, governance, and measures of performance in a worldwide setting. Forest Products Journal. 57(10). 6–13. 1 indexed citations
18.
Ellefson, Paul V., et al.. (2007). Forest products research and development organizations : organization, governance, and measures of performance in a worldwide setting. Forest Products Journal. 57(10). 6–13. 2 indexed citations
20.
Skog, Kenneth E., et al.. (1995). Wood Products Technology Trends: Changing the Face of Forestry. Journal of Forestry. 93(12). 30–33. 3 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026