Charles Fantazzi
- Anthropology top 10%
- Literature and Literary Theory
- History top 10%
- Classics top 10%
- Philosophy top 10%
- Co-authors
- Juan Luis VivèsDavid B. QuinnCesare BrandiEleanor Winsor LeachA. N. Sherwin-WhiteAlessandro PerosaPlinyDesiderius Erasmus
- Topics
- Classical Antiquity Studies (6 papers)Historical and Literary Analyses (4 papers)Renaissance and Early Modern Studies (4 papers)
- Partner nations
- CanadaUnited States
In The Last Decade
Charles Fantazzi
21 papers receiving 76 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 36
- Anthropology 42
- Literature and Literary Theory 24
- History 24
- Classics 21
- Philosophy 19
Countries citing papers authored by Charles Fantazzi
This map shows the geographic impact of Charles Fantazzi's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Charles Fantazzi with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Charles Fantazzi more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Charles Fantazzi
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Charles Fantazzi. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Charles Fantazzi. The network helps show where Charles Fantazzi may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Charles Fantazzi
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Charles Fantazzi. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Charles Fantazzi based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Charles Fantazzi. Charles Fantazzi is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Adagios del poder y de la guerra. Teoría del adagio | 1 |
| 2 | De Subventione Pauperum sive De Humanis Necessitatibus, libri II | 0 |
| 3 | Poliziano's Fabula di Orfeo: a Contaminatio of Classical and Vernacular Themes | 0 |
| 4 | 17 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | De institutione feminae Christianae | 22 |
| 7 | 3 | |
| 8 | In pseudodialecticos : a critical edition | 2 |
| 9 | 0 | |
| 10 | 0 | |
| 11 | 0 | |
| 12 | 1 | |
| 13 | 1 | |
| 14 | 0 | |
| 15 | 6 | |
| 16 | 0 | |
| 17 | 0 | |
| 18 | 3 | |
| 19 | 4 | |
| 20 | 12 |
About Charles Fantazzi
Charles Fantazzi is a scholar working on General Arts and Humanities, Classics and Religious studies, having authored 41 papers that have together received 123 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Classical Antiquity Studies (6 papers), Historical and Literary Analyses (4 papers) and Renaissance and Early Modern Studies (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Classics (21 citations), Anthropology (42 citations) and Religious studies (15 citations). Charles Fantazzi has collaborated with scholars based in Canada and United States. Frequent co-authors include Juan Luis Vivès, David B. Quinn, Cesare Brandi, Eleanor Winsor Leach, A. N. Sherwin-White, Alessandro Perosa, Pliny, Desiderius Erasmus, Edoardo Sanguineti and Alexander Dalzell. Their work appears in journals such as The Classical World, The American Journal of Philology and Phoenix.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.