R. H. Bing
- Geometry and Topology top 0.2%
- Mathematical Physics top 0.5%
- Computational Theory and Mathematics top 1%
- Applied Mathematics top 2%
- Algebra and Number Theory top 5%
- Co-authors
- Robert D. AndersonJoseph MartinF. Burton JonesR. Daniel MauldinW. W. BledsoeJ. M. KisterKarol BorsukSteve Armentrout
- Topics
- Advanced Topology and Set Theory (11 papers)Mathematics and Applications (10 papers)Advanced Numerical Analysis Techniques (10 papers)
- Journals
- Annals of MathematicsTransactions of the American Mathematical SocietyAmerican Mathematical Monthly
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
R. H. Bing
59 papers receiving 1.0k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 75
- Geometry and Topology 1.5k
- Mathematical Physics 1.1k
- Computational Theory and Mathematics 466
- Applied Mathematics 291
- Algebra and Number Theory 282
Countries citing papers authored by R. H. Bing
This map shows the geographic impact of R. H. Bing's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by R. H. Bing with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites R. H. Bing more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by R. H. Bing
This network shows the impact of papers produced by R. H. Bing. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by R. H. Bing. The network helps show where R. H. Bing may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of R. H. Bing
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of R. H. Bing. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of R. H. Bing based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with R. H. Bing. R. H. Bing is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 | |
| 2 | 10 | |
| 3 | 46 | |
| 4 | 56 | |
| 5 | 7 | |
| 6 | Topology Seminar, Wisconsin, 1965 | 13 |
| 7 | 16 | |
| 8 | 21 | |
| 9 | 2 | |
| 10 | 18 | |
| 11 | 3 | |
| 12 | 3 | |
| 13 | 31 | |
| 14 | 27 | |
| 15 | 1 | |
| 16 | 46 | |
| 17 | 24 | |
| 18 | 19 | |
| 19 | 56 | |
| 20 | 326 |
About R. H. Bing
R. H. Bing is a scholar working on Geometry and Topology, Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design and Theoretical Computer Science, having authored 65 papers that have together received 2.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Topology and Set Theory (11 papers), Mathematics and Applications (10 papers) and Advanced Numerical Analysis Techniques (10 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geometry and Topology (1.5k citations), Mathematical Physics (1.1k citations) and Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design (262 citations). R. H. Bing has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Robert D. Anderson, Joseph Martin, F. Burton Jones, R. Daniel Mauldin, W. W. Bledsoe, J. M. Kister, Karol Borsuk, Steve Armentrout, Morton L. Curtis and Victor Klee. Their work appears in journals such as Annals of Mathematics, Transactions of the American Mathematical Society and American Mathematical Monthly.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.