R. Darcy

1.1k citations
39 papers · 754 indexed · h-index 16

Impact in

Papers in

R. Darcy

32 papers receiving 608 citations

Peers

R. Darcy
Comparison fields: 5 of 54
  • Gender Studies 346
  • Political Science and International Relations 558
  • Communication 79
  • Sociology and Political Science 253
  • Economics and Econometrics 145
Replace Jonathan Woon with:
Jonathan Woon United States
Nick Vivyan United Kingdom
Brad Lockerbie United States
Priscilla L. Southwell United States
Mitchell S. Sanders United States
David B. Magleby United States
Bradley Palmquist United States
Justin H. Kirkland United States
Stanley Kelley United States
Thad A. Brown United States
R. Darcy relative to Jonathan Woon United States Jonathan Woon's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Jonathan Woon · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by R. Darcy

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of R. Darcy's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by R. Darcy with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites R. Darcy more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by R. Darcy

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by R. Darcy. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by R. Darcy. The network helps show where R. Darcy may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 15 scholars most cited alongside R. Darcy, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with R. Darcy Line = papers co-authored together R. Darcy links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20082
2
WOMAN SUFFRAGE IN OKLAHOMA
20050
3 199816
4 19965
5
A guide to quantitative history
19955
6
Women, elections & representation
199440
7 199418
8 19939
9 199334
10 199224
11 19912
12 199033
13 19906
14 198950
15 198630
16 198653
17 19838
18 19823
19 19820
20
THE SOCIAL BASIS OF AMERICAN POLITICS
19791

About R. Darcy

R. Darcy is a scholar working on Gender Studies, Political Science and International Relations, Economics and Econometrics, Cultural Studies and Anthropology, having authored 39 papers that have together received 754 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Electoral Systems and Political Participation (11 papers), Gender Politics and Representation (9 papers), Social Policy and Reform Studies (5 papers), Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics (2 papers), Japanese History and Culture (2 papers), Internet Traffic Analysis and Secure E-voting (2 papers), Policy Transfer and Learning (2 papers) and Diverse Academic Research Areas (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Gender Studies (346 citations), Political Science and International Relations (558 citations), Communication (79 citations), Sociology and Political Science (253 citations) and Economics and Econometrics (145 citations). R. Darcy has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and Ireland. Frequent co-authors include Ian McAllister, Janet Clark, Anne L. Schneider, Susan Welch, Anne Schneider, Charles D. Hadley, Michael Laver, Michael Marsh, Mark Daniels and Malcolm Mackerras. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Political Science, Electoral Studies, Public Opinion Quarterly, Journal of Theoretical Politics and American Political Science Review.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026