R. C. Rashkov
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics top 5%
- Astronomy and Astrophysics top 5%
- Statistical and Nonlinear Physics top 5%
- Geometry and Topology top 5%
- Mathematical Physics
- Co-authors
- H. DimovNikolay BobevP. BozhilovM. StanishkovVeselin G. FilevChangrim AhnK. S. ViswanathanDaniel Grumiller
- Topics
- Black Holes and Theoretical Physics (44 papers)Cosmology and Gravitation Theories (34 papers)Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies (13 papers)
In The Last Decade
R. C. Rashkov
47 papers receiving 523 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 26
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics 499
- Astronomy and Astrophysics 348
- Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 206
- Geometry and Topology 73
- Mathematical Physics 38
Countries citing papers authored by R. C. Rashkov
This map shows the geographic impact of R. C. Rashkov's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by R. C. Rashkov with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites R. C. Rashkov more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by R. C. Rashkov
This network shows the impact of papers produced by R. C. Rashkov. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by R. C. Rashkov. The network helps show where R. C. Rashkov may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of R. C. Rashkov
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of R. C. Rashkov. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of R. C. Rashkov based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with R. C. Rashkov. R. C. Rashkov is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 13 | |
| 5 | 2 | |
| 6 | 5 | |
| 7 | 1 | |
| 8 | 1 | |
| 9 | 31 | |
| 10 | 34 | |
| 11 | 25 | |
| 12 | Semiclassical Strings in Lunin-Maldacena Background | 10 |
| 13 | 12 | |
| 14 | 35 | |
| 15 | 48 | |
| 16 | Ts...sT transformation on $AdS_{5}\times S^{5}$ background | 1 |
| 17 | 25 | |
| 18 | 14 | |
| 19 | 13 | |
| 20 | 3 |
About R. C. Rashkov
R. C. Rashkov is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Astronomy and Astrophysics and Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, having authored 48 papers that have together received 539 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Black Holes and Theoretical Physics (44 papers), Cosmology and Gravitation Theories (34 papers) and Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies (13 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nuclear and High Energy Physics (499 citations), Astronomy and Astrophysics (348 citations) and Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (206 citations). R. C. Rashkov has collaborated with scholars based in Bulgaria, Austria and Canada. Frequent co-authors include H. Dimov, Nikolay Bobev, P. Bozhilov, M. Stanishkov, Veselin G. Filev, Changrim Ahn, K. S. Viswanathan, Daniel Grumiller, Carlos Núñez and Alfonso V. Ramallo. Their work appears in journals such as Nuclear Physics B, Physics Letters B and Journal of High Energy Physics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.