Neil R. Constable
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics top 5%
- Astronomy and Astrophysics top 5%
- Statistical and Nonlinear Physics top 5%
- Geometry and Topology top 10%
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics
- Co-authors
- Robert C. MyersØyvind TafjordJohanna ErdmengerIngo KirschZachary GuralnikDaniel Z. FreedmanShiraz MinwallaMatthew Headrick
- Topics
- Black Holes and Theoretical Physics (14 papers)Cosmology and Gravitation Theories (12 papers)Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories (7 papers)
- Journals
- Journal of High Energy PhysicsFortschritte der PhysikPhysical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields
- Partner nations
- CanadaUnited StatesGermany
In The Last Decade
Neil R. Constable
14 papers receiving 579 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 29
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics 585
- Astronomy and Astrophysics 393
- Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 207
- Geometry and Topology 45
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 32
Countries citing papers authored by Neil R. Constable
This map shows the geographic impact of Neil R. Constable's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Neil R. Constable with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Neil R. Constable more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Neil R. Constable
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Neil R. Constable. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Neil R. Constable. The network helps show where Neil R. Constable may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Neil R. Constable
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Neil R. Constable. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Neil R. Constable based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Neil R. Constable. Neil R. Constable is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 19 | |
| 2 | 30 | |
| 3 | 3 | |
| 4 | 67 | |
| 5 | 85 | |
| 6 | 34 | |
| 7 | 13 | |
| 8 | 8 | |
| 9 | 67 | |
| 10 | Fractional Branes and the Entropy of 4D Black holes | 9 |
| 11 | 115 | |
| 12 | 47 | |
| 13 | 27 | |
| 14 | 79 |
About Neil R. Constable
Neil R. Constable is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Astronomy and Astrophysics and Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, having authored 14 papers that have together received 603 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Black Holes and Theoretical Physics (14 papers), Cosmology and Gravitation Theories (12 papers) and Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nuclear and High Energy Physics (585 citations), Astronomy and Astrophysics (393 citations) and Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (207 citations). Neil R. Constable has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Robert C. Myers, Øyvind Tafjord, Johanna Erdmenger, Ingo Kirsch, Zachary Guralnik, Daniel Z. Freedman, Shiraz Minwalla, Matthew Headrick, Finn Larsen and C. P. Burgess. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of High Energy Physics, Fortschritte der Physik and Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.