Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Third Reference Catalogue of Bright Galaxies
1991995 citationsG. de Vaucouleurs, A. de Vaucouleurs et al.profile →
Third Reference Catalogue of Bright Galaxies
1991953 citationsG. de Vaucouleurs, A. de Vaucouleurs et al.profile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of R. Buta's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by R. Buta with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites R. Buta more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by R. Buta. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by R. Buta. The network helps show where R. Buta may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of R. Buta
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of R. Buta.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of R. Buta based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with R. Buta. R. Buta is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Buta, R., David C. Kopaska‐Merkel, & Dana J. Ehret. (2016). Footprints in Stone: Fossil Traces of Coal-Age Tetrapods.5 indexed citations
4.
Buta, R.. (2015). A classical morphological analysis of galaxies in the Spitzer Survey of Stellar Structure in Galaxies (S ^(4) G). LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas).100 indexed citations
Salo, H., E. Laurikainen, R. Buta, & J. H. Knapen. (2010). BARS DO DRIVE SPIRAL DENSITY WAVES. The Astrophysical Journal Letters. 715(1). L56–L61.49 indexed citations
7.
Haubold, Hartmut, et al.. (2005). INTERPRETATION OF THE TETRAPOD FOOTPRINTS FROM THE EARLY PENNSYLVANIAN OF ALABAMA. reroDoc Digital Library.27 indexed citations
Buta, R.. (1996). Obituary: Gerard Henri De Vaucouleurs, 1918-1995. Bulletin of the American Astronomical Society. 28(4). 1449–1450.
14.
Buta, R., D. A. Crocker, & Bruce G. Elmegreen. (1996). Barred galaxies : IAU Colloquium 157, conference held at the University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, Alabama, 30 May-3 June 1995. Astronomical Society of the Pacific eBooks.2 indexed citations
Vaucouleurs, A. de, H. G. Corwin, R. Buta, et al.. (1992). Book Review: Third reference catalogue of bright galaxies / Springer, 1991. Observatory. 112(1108). 127.2 indexed citations
17.
Vaucouleurs, G. de, A. de Vaucouleurs, H. G. Corwin, et al.. (1991). Book-Review - Third Reference Catalogue of Bright Galaxies. S&T. 82. 621.2 indexed citations
18.
Burbidge, G. R., R. Buta, G. G. Byrd, et al.. (1990). IAC volume 124 Cover and Front matter. International Astronomical Union Colloquium. 124. f1–f13.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.