J. M. E. Hyland
- Artificial Intelligence top 2%
- Computational Theory and Mathematics top 1%
- Mathematical Physics top 10%
- Geometry and Topology top 10%
- Computer Networks and Communications
- Co-authors
- C.-H. Luke OngPeter JohnstoneAndrew M. PittsGiuseppe RosoliniE. Powell RobinsonΝ. H. BinghamDavid G. KendallAlexander Razborov
- Topics
- Logic, programming, and type systems (5 papers)Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge (4 papers)Homotopy and Cohomology in Algebraic Topology (3 papers)
- Journals
- Theoretical Computer ScienceBulletin of the London Mathematical SocietyMathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society
- Partner nations
- United KingdomItalySingapore
In The Last Decade
J. M. E. Hyland
13 papers receiving 546 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 47
- Artificial Intelligence 533
- Computational Theory and Mathematics 423
- Mathematical Physics 71
- Geometry and Topology 53
- Computer Networks and Communications 44
Countries citing papers authored by J. M. E. Hyland
This map shows the geographic impact of J. M. E. Hyland's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J. M. E. Hyland with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J. M. E. Hyland more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by J. M. E. Hyland
This network shows the impact of papers produced by J. M. E. Hyland. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J. M. E. Hyland. The network helps show where J. M. E. Hyland may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of J. M. E. Hyland
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of J. M. E. Hyland. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of J. M. E. Hyland based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with J. M. E. Hyland. J. M. E. Hyland is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 5 | |
| 2 | 5 | |
| 3 | 23 | |
| 4 | 282 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 9 | |
| 7 | 21 | |
| 8 | Pi-Calculus, Dialogue Games and PCF. | 28 |
| 9 | 42 | |
| 10 | 16 | |
| 11 | 75 | |
| 12 | 59 | |
| 13 | 45 |
About J. M. E. Hyland
J. M. E. Hyland is a scholar working on Theoretical Computer Science, Computational Theory and Mathematics and Algebra and Number Theory, having authored 13 papers that have together received 611 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Logic, programming, and type systems (5 papers), Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge (4 papers) and Homotopy and Cohomology in Algebraic Topology (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Computational Theory and Mathematics (423 citations), Artificial Intelligence (533 citations) and Mathematical Physics (71 citations). J. M. E. Hyland has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Italy and Singapore. Frequent co-authors include C.-H. Luke Ong, Peter Johnstone, Andrew M. Pitts, Giuseppe Rosolini, E. Powell Robinson, Ν. H. Bingham, David G. Kendall, Alexander Razborov, G. G. Lorentz and W. K. Hayman. Their work appears in journals such as Theoretical Computer Science, Bulletin of the London Mathematical Society and Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.