J. M. E. Hyland

1.9k total citations
13 papers, 611 citations indexed

About

J. M. E. Hyland is a scholar working on Computational Theory and Mathematics, Artificial Intelligence and Mathematical Physics. According to data from OpenAlex, J. M. E. Hyland has authored 13 papers receiving a total of 611 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 7 papers in Computational Theory and Mathematics, 5 papers in Artificial Intelligence and 3 papers in Mathematical Physics. Recurrent topics in J. M. E. Hyland's work include Logic, programming, and type systems (5 papers), Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge (4 papers) and Homotopy and Cohomology in Algebraic Topology (3 papers). J. M. E. Hyland is often cited by papers focused on Logic, programming, and type systems (5 papers), Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge (4 papers) and Homotopy and Cohomology in Algebraic Topology (3 papers). J. M. E. Hyland collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Italy and Singapore. J. M. E. Hyland's co-authors include C.-H. Luke Ong, Peter Johnstone, Andrew M. Pitts, Giuseppe Rosolini, E. Powell Robinson, Ν. H. Bingham, David G. Kendall, Alexander Razborov, G. G. Lorentz and W. K. Hayman and has published in prestigious journals such as Theoretical Computer Science, Bulletin of the London Mathematical Society and Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

In The Last Decade

J. M. E. Hyland

13 papers receiving 546 citations

Peers

J. M. E. Hyland

AI

CTM

MP

GT

CNC

Thomas Ehrhard France

J. L. Bell Canada

Laurent Régnier France

J. I. Zucker Canada

Freek Wiedijk Netherlands

Paul-André Melliès France

Peter Dybjer Sweden

Thorsten Altenkirch United Kingdom

Jacques Sakarovitch France

Martin Hyland United Kingdom

Thomas Ehrhard France

J. M. E. Hyland

606 ×1.1

AI

467 ×1.1

CTM

60 ×0.8

MP

40 ×0.8

GT

66 ×1.5

CNC

Citations per year, relative to J. M. E. Hyland J. M. E. Hyland (= 1×) peers Thomas Ehrhard

Countries citing papers authored by J. M. E. Hyland

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of J. M. E. Hyland's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J. M. E. Hyland with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J. M. E. Hyland more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by J. M. E. Hyland

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by J. M. E. Hyland. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J. M. E. Hyland. The network helps show where J. M. E. Hyland may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of J. M. E. Hyland

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of J. M. E. Hyland. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of J. M. E. Hyland based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with J. M. E. Hyland. J. M. E. Hyland is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

13 of 13 papers shown

1.

Cooper, S. Barry, Andrew Hodges, Martin Davis, et al.. (2016). The Once and Future Turing. Cambridge University Press eBooks. 5 indexed citations

2.

Hyland, J. M. E.. (2014). Elements of a theory of algebraic theories. Theoretical Computer Science. 546. 132–144. 5 indexed citations

3.

Hyland, J. M. E.. (2002). Proof theory in the abstract. Annals of Pure and Applied Logic. 114(1-3). 43–78. 23 indexed citations

4.

Hyland, J. M. E. & C.-H. Luke Ong. (2000). On Full Abstraction for PCF: I, II, and III. Information and Computation. 163(2). 285–408. 282 indexed citations

5.

Hyland, J. M. E.. (1999). Variations on Realizability. Electronic Notes in Theoretical Computer Science. 23(1). 166–188. 1 indexed citations

6.

Hyland, J. M. E.. (1998). DEFINABILITY AND COMPUTABILITY (Siberian School of Algebra and Logic). Bulletin of the London Mathematical Society. 30(2). 196–197. 9 indexed citations

7.

Hyland, J. M. E. & C.-H. Luke Ong. (1995). Pi-calculus, dialogue games and full abstraction PCF. 96–107. 21 indexed citations

8.

Hyland, J. M. E. & C.-H. Luke Ong. (1995). Pi-Calculus, Dialogue Games and PCF.. 96–107. 28 indexed citations

9.

Hyland, J. M. E., E. Powell Robinson, & Giuseppe Rosolini. (1990). The Discrete Objects in the Effective Topos. Proceedings of the London Mathematical Society. s3-60(1). 1–36. 42 indexed citations

10.

Kendall, David G., G. K. Batchelor, Ν. H. Bingham, et al.. (1990). Andrei Nikolaevich Kolmogorov (1903-1987). Bulletin of the London Mathematical Society. 22(1). 31–100. 16 indexed citations

11.

Hyland, J. M. E.. (1988). A small complete category. Annals of Pure and Applied Logic. 40(2). 135–165. 75 indexed citations

12.

Hyland, J. M. E., Peter Johnstone, & Andrew M. Pitts. (1980). Tripos theory. Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society. 88(2). 205–232. 59 indexed citations

13.

Hyland, J. M. E.. (1979). Filter spaces and continuous functionals. Annals of Mathematical Logic. 16(2). 101–143. 45 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact