Q.B. Chung

682 total citations
29 papers, 469 citations indexed

About

Q.B. Chung is a scholar working on Management Information Systems, Artificial Intelligence and Information Systems. According to data from OpenAlex, Q.B. Chung has authored 29 papers receiving a total of 469 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 13 papers in Management Information Systems, 7 papers in Artificial Intelligence and 6 papers in Information Systems. Recurrent topics in Q.B. Chung's work include Business Process Modeling and Analysis (10 papers), Advanced Database Systems and Queries (4 papers) and ERP Systems Implementation and Impact (4 papers). Q.B. Chung is often cited by papers focused on Business Process Modeling and Analysis (10 papers), Advanced Database Systems and Queries (4 papers) and ERP Systems Implementation and Impact (4 papers). Q.B. Chung collaborates with scholars based in United States, South Korea and Qatar. Q.B. Chung's co-authors include William P. Wagner, Wayne G. Bremser, Wenhong Luo, Robert L. Nydick, Matthew J. Liberatore, Elliot B. Sloane, James Otto, Robert M. O’Keefe, Han Li and Ranjit Bose and has published in prestigious journals such as Expert Systems with Applications, Journal of the Operational Research Society and Information & Management.

In The Last Decade

Q.B. Chung

29 papers receiving 418 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Q.B. Chung United States 13 145 84 78 71 66 29 469
Salvatore Belardo United States 15 110 0.8× 105 1.3× 103 1.3× 75 1.1× 50 0.8× 37 564
Andrew J. Czuchry United States 13 122 0.8× 83 1.0× 115 1.5× 51 0.7× 47 0.7× 44 371
Chui-Yu Chiu Taiwan 11 97 0.7× 191 2.3× 118 1.5× 59 0.8× 62 0.9× 30 594
Choon Seong Leem South Korea 15 181 1.2× 40 0.5× 127 1.6× 100 1.4× 79 1.2× 54 603
Himangshu Paul Thailand 10 178 1.2× 34 0.4× 189 2.4× 66 0.9× 54 0.8× 20 447
Robert Plant United States 10 227 1.6× 34 0.4× 90 1.2× 68 1.0× 105 1.6× 35 549
John G. Mooney United States 11 301 2.1× 57 0.7× 115 1.5× 110 1.5× 95 1.4× 38 687
Catherine Marinagi Greece 13 166 1.1× 38 0.5× 133 1.7× 133 1.9× 77 1.2× 27 545
Hanifa Shah United Kingdom 12 100 0.7× 52 0.6× 46 0.6× 96 1.4× 37 0.6× 56 452
Evan E. Anderson United States 14 176 1.2× 52 0.6× 155 2.0× 106 1.5× 54 0.8× 37 615

Countries citing papers authored by Q.B. Chung

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Q.B. Chung's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Q.B. Chung with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Q.B. Chung more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Q.B. Chung

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Q.B. Chung. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Q.B. Chung. The network helps show where Q.B. Chung may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Q.B. Chung

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Q.B. Chung. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Q.B. Chung based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Q.B. Chung. Q.B. Chung is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Chung, Q.B., et al.. (2018). Making a case for speech analytics to improve customer service quality: Vision, implementation, and evaluation. International Journal of Information Management. 45. 223–232. 32 indexed citations
2.
Luo, Xin, et al.. (2018). Cloud computing capability: its technological root and business impact. Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce. 28(3). 193–213. 27 indexed citations
3.
Luo, Xin, Wei Zhang, Ranjit Bose, Han Li, & Q.B. Chung. (2018). Producing competitive advantage from an infrastructure technology: The case of cloud computing. Information Systems Management. 35(2). 147–160. 20 indexed citations
4.
Chung, Q.B., et al.. (2008). Expert systems for strategic planning in operations management: a framework for executive decisions. International Journal of Management and Decision Making. 9(3). 310–310. 4 indexed citations
5.
Chung, Q.B., Wenhong Luo, & William P. Wagner. (2006). Strategic alliance of small firms in knowledge industries. Business Process Management Journal. 12(2). 206–233. 20 indexed citations
6.
Chung, Q.B.. (2005). Sage on the Stage in the Digital Age: The Role of Online Lecture in Distance Learning.. The Electronic Journal of e-Learning. 3(1). 1–14. 6 indexed citations
7.
Bremser, Wayne G. & Q.B. Chung. (2005). A framework for performance measurement in the e-business environment. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications. 4(4). 395–412. 61 indexed citations
8.
Wagner, William P., et al.. (2004). eXtensible Markup Language (XML) for Competitive Advantage. Journal of international technology and information management. 13(3). 1 indexed citations
9.
Sloane, Elliot B., Matthew J. Liberatore, Robert L. Nydick, Wenhong Luo, & Q.B. Chung. (2003). Using the analytic hierarchy process as a clinical engineering tool to facilitate an iterative, multidisciplinary, microeconomic health technology assessment. Computers & Operations Research. 30(10). 1447–1465. 69 indexed citations
10.
Sloane, Elliot B., Matthew J. Liberatore, Robert L. Nydick, Wenchang Luo, & Q.B. Chung. (2002). Clinical engineering technology assessment decision support: a case study using the analytic hierarchy process (AHP). 1950–1951 vol.3. 20 indexed citations
11.
Wagner, William P., James Otto, & Q.B. Chung. (2002). Knowledge acquisition for expert systems in accounting and financial problem domains. Knowledge-Based Systems. 15(8). 439–447. 50 indexed citations
12.
Nydick, Robert L., Matthew J. Liberatore, & Q.B. Chung. (2002). Modeling By Elaboration: An Application To Visual Process Simulation. INFOR Information Systems and Operational Research. 40(4). 347–361. 4 indexed citations
13.
Joglekar, Prafulla, Q.B. Chung, & Madjid Tavana. (2001). Note on a Comparative Evaluation of Nine Well-Known Algorithms for Solving the Cell Formulation Problem in Group Technology. SSRN Electronic Journal. 1 indexed citations
14.
Chung, Q.B., et al.. (2001). Extensible markup language and knowledge management. Journal of Knowledge Management. 5(3). 278–285. 4 indexed citations
15.
Joglekar, Prafulla, Q.B. Chung, & Madjid Tavana. (2001). Note on a comparative evaluation of nine well-known algorithms forsolving the cell formation problem in group technology. Journal of Applied Mathematics and Decision Sciences. 5(4). 253–268. 7 indexed citations
16.
Chung, Q.B., et al.. (2001). Lessons learned from developing a mission-critical expert system with multiple experts through rapid prototyping. Expert Systems with Applications. 20(2). 217–227. 14 indexed citations
17.
Tavana, Madjid, et al.. (1998). Rho: A decision support system for pricing in law firms. Information & Management. 33(3). 155–165. 5 indexed citations
18.
19.
O’Keefe, Robert M., et al.. (1993). The Impact of Expert Systems in Accounting: System Characteristics, Productivity and Work Unit Effects. Intelligent Systems in Accounting Finance & Management. 2(3). 177–189. 15 indexed citations
20.
Chung, Q.B. & Robert M. O’Keefe. (1992). A formal analysis of the model management literature. Annals of Operations Research. 38(1). 137–176. 8 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026