Q. Aurelius Symmachus

1.0k citations
7 papers · 66 indexed · h-index 4
Topics
Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies (2 papers)Historical and Religious Studies of Rome (2 papers)Byzantine Studies and History (2 papers)
Journals
Oxford University Press eBooksMedical Entomology and ZoologyBayerische Staatsbibliothek

In The Last Decade

Q. Aurelius Symmachus

5 papers receiving 26 citations

Peers

Q. Aurelius Symmachus
Comparison fields: 5 of 15
  • Anthropology 43
  • Classics 25
  • History 20
  • Archeology 18
  • Philosophy 9
Replace John P. Cavarnos with:
John P. Cavarnos United States
Cornelius Tacitus
Manfred Fuhrmann United States
Peter E. Pieler
J. C. Yardley Canada
Edward V. George United States
Santo Mazzarino
A. C. Dionisotti United Kingdom
Christian Hannick
William C. McDermott United States
Q. Aurelius Symmachus relative to John P. Cavarnos United States John P. Cavarnos's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.3×
John P. Cavarnos · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Q. Aurelius Symmachus

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Q. Aurelius Symmachus's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Q. Aurelius Symmachus with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Q. Aurelius Symmachus more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Q. Aurelius Symmachus

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Q. Aurelius Symmachus. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Q. Aurelius Symmachus. The network helps show where Q. Aurelius Symmachus may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Q. Aurelius Symmachus

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Q. Aurelius Symmachus. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Q. Aurelius Symmachus based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Q. Aurelius Symmachus. Q. Aurelius Symmachus is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

7 of 7 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 43
2
Concordantiae in Q. Aurelii Symmachi opera =: A concordance to Symmachus
1
3
Commento storico al Libro IX dell'Epistolario di Q. Aurelio Simmaco
10
4
Commento storico alle Relationes di Quinto Aurelio Simmaco : introduzione, commento, testo, traduzione, appendice sul libro X, 1-2, indici
3
5
Prefect and emperor;: The Relationes of Symmachus, A.D. 384;
2
6
Der Streit um den Victoriaaltar
2
7
Q. Aurelii Symmachi quae supersunt
5

About Q. Aurelius Symmachus

Q. Aurelius Symmachus is a scholar working on Classics, Archeology and History, having authored 7 papers that have together received 66 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies (2 papers), Historical and Religious Studies of Rome (2 papers) and Byzantine Studies and History (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Classics (25 citations), Anthropology (43 citations) and History (20 citations). Frequent co-authors include Quintus Tullius Cicero, Otto Seeck and Antonio Zampollí. Their work appears in journals such as Oxford University Press eBooks, Medical Entomology and Zoology and Bayerische Staatsbibliothek.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026