Countries citing papers authored by Antonio Zampollí
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Antonio Zampollí's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Antonio Zampollí with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Antonio Zampollí more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Antonio Zampollí
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Antonio Zampollí. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Antonio Zampollí. The network helps show where Antonio Zampollí may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Antonio Zampollí
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Antonio Zampollí.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Antonio Zampollí based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Antonio Zampollí. Antonio Zampollí is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Bel, Núria, Francesca Bertagna, Pierrette Bouillon, et al.. (2002). From Resources to Applications. Designing the Multilingual ISLE Lexical Entry.. Language Resources and Evaluation.6 indexed citations
2.
Monachini, Monica, et al.. (2002). CLIPS, a Multi-level Italian Computational Lexicon: a Glimpse to Data. Language Resources and Evaluation.18 indexed citations
3.
Calzolari, Nicoletta, Charles J. Fillmore, Ralph Grishman, et al.. (2002). Towards Best Practice for Multiword Expressions in Computational Lexicons. Language Resources and Evaluation.82 indexed citations
Villegas, Marta, et al.. (2000). Multilingual linguistic resources: from monolingual lexicons to bilingual interrelated lexicons. Language Resources and Evaluation.1 indexed citations
7.
Alonge, Antonietta, et al.. (2000). Encoding information on adjectives in a lexical-semantic net for computational applications. The COCOON platform (University of Paris). 42–49.13 indexed citations
8.
Bel, Núria, Nicoletta Calzolari, Elisabetta Gola, et al.. (2000). SIMPLE: A General Framework for the Development of Multilingual Lexicons. Language Resources and Evaluation.9 indexed citations
9.
Calzolari, Nicoletta, et al.. (2000). An Experiment of Lexical-Semantic Tagging of an Italian Corpus.. Language Resources and Evaluation.2 indexed citations
10.
Montemagni⋄, Simonetta, Nicoletta Calzolari, Antonio Zampollí, et al.. (2000). The Italian Syntactic-Semantic Treebank: Architecture, Annotation, Tools and Evaluation. Cineca Institutional Research Information System (Tor Vergata University). 18–27.13 indexed citations
11.
Alonge, Antonietta, Francesca Bertagna, Nicoletta Calzolari, et al.. (2000). ItalWordNet: a large semantic database for the automatic treatment of the Italian language.8 indexed citations
Zampollí, Antonio. (1991). Los bancos de datos léxicos: bases multifuncionales de datos léxicos. Dialnet (Universidad de la Rioja). 127–146.1 indexed citations
18.
Zampollí, Antonio, et al.. (1973). Proceedings of the 14th conference on Computational linguistics - Volume 1. International Conference on Computational Linguistics.11 indexed citations
Zampollí, Antonio. (1973). Humanities computing in Italy. Computers and the Humanities. 7(6). 343–360.6 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.