William C. McDermott

79 total papers · 605 total citations
25 papers, 71 citations indexed

About

William C. McDermott is a scholar working on Anthropology, Archeology and Organic Chemistry. According to data from OpenAlex, William C. McDermott has authored 25 papers receiving a total of 71 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 14 papers in Anthropology, 5 papers in Archeology and 4 papers in Organic Chemistry. Recurrent topics in William C. McDermott's work include Classical Antiquity Studies (13 papers), Organic Chemistry Synthesis Methods (4 papers) and Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies (3 papers). William C. McDermott is often cited by papers focused on Classical Antiquity Studies (13 papers), Organic Chemistry Synthesis Methods (4 papers) and Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies (3 papers). William C. McDermott collaborates with scholars based in United States. William C. McDermott's co-authors include A. N. Sherwin-White, Werner Eck, M. Gwyn Morgan, R. G. M. Nisbet, W. K. Lacey, Moses Hadas and John V. A. Fine and has published in prestigious journals such as The Classical World, American Journal of Archaeology and Phoenix.

In The Last Decade

William C. McDermott

18 papers receiving 44 citations

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author Last Decade Papers Cites
William C. McDermott 54 23 16 13 11 25 71
Cornelius Tacitus 37 0.7× 20 0.9× 12 0.8× 6 0.5× 6 0.5× 35 70
Scott McGill 59 1.1× 17 0.7× 9 0.6× 11 0.8× 17 1.5× 18 88
Lukas de Blois 50 0.9× 43 1.9× 30 1.9× 6 0.5× 11 1.0× 24 88
J. C. Yardley 65 1.2× 36 1.6× 15 0.9× 10 0.8× 9 0.8× 31 106
Roger Rees 49 0.9× 27 1.2× 21 1.3× 8 0.6× 7 0.6× 18 70
Carsten Hjort Lange 54 1.0× 31 1.3× 20 1.3× 9 0.7× 5 0.5× 23 65
A. R. Birley 57 1.1× 52 2.3× 30 1.9× 8 0.6× 5 0.5× 23 109
Lieve Van Hoof 36 0.7× 35 1.5× 8 0.5× 4 0.3× 13 1.2× 28 68
Frederik Juliaan Vervaet 66 1.2× 40 1.7× 32 2.0× 5 0.4× 3 0.3× 26 73
Gianpiero Rosati 89 1.6× 32 1.4× 6 0.4× 20 1.5× 17 1.5× 25 109

Countries citing papers authored by William C. McDermott

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William C. McDermott's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William C. McDermott with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William C. McDermott more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William C. McDermott

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William C. McDermott. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William C. McDermott. The network helps show where William C. McDermott may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of William C. McDermott

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of William C. McDermott. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of William C. McDermott based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with William C. McDermott. William C. McDermott is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Loading papers...

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026