Pnina Shinebourne
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- General Health Professions top 10%
- Social Psychology top 10%
- Education top 10%
- Co-authors
- Jonathan A. SmithAmanda HoltBelinda Brooks‐GordonSevasti‐Melissa NolasNollaig FrostCigdem EsinMartin R. AdamsBahman Baluch
- Topics
- Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics (3 papers)Art Therapy and Mental Health (3 papers)Q Methodology Applications (3 papers)
- Journals
- Qualitative ResearchInternational Journal of Qualitative MethodsInternational Journal of Mental Health and Addiction
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited States
In The Last Decade
Pnina Shinebourne
16 papers receiving 566 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 112
- Sociology and Political Science 173
- Clinical Psychology 170
- General Health Professions 127
- Social Psychology 117
- Education 84
Countries citing papers authored by Pnina Shinebourne
This map shows the geographic impact of Pnina Shinebourne's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Pnina Shinebourne with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Pnina Shinebourne more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Pnina Shinebourne
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Pnina Shinebourne. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Pnina Shinebourne. The network helps show where Pnina Shinebourne may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Pnina Shinebourne
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Pnina Shinebourne. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Pnina Shinebourne based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Pnina Shinebourne. Pnina Shinebourne is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 9 | |
| 2 | qualitative approaches on the analysis of qualitative data Pluralism in qualitative research: the impact of different researchers and | 2 |
| 3 | 103 | |
| 4 | Drawings of self and best friend by children undergoing dialysis | 2 |
| 5 | 38 | |
| 6 | 5 | |
| 7 | 34 | |
| 8 | 28 | |
| 9 | 113 | |
| 10 | 76 | |
| 11 | 87 | |
| 12 | 91 | |
| 13 | 9 | |
| 14 | 24 | |
| 15 | 8 | |
| 16 | 2 |
About Pnina Shinebourne
Pnina Shinebourne is a scholar working on Conservation, Music and General Social Sciences, having authored 16 papers that have together received 631 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics (3 papers), Art Therapy and Mental Health (3 papers) and Q Methodology Applications (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Conservation (32 citations), Clinical Psychology (170 citations) and Social Psychology (117 citations). Pnina Shinebourne has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Jonathan A. Smith, Amanda Holt, Belinda Brooks‐Gordon, Sevasti‐Melissa Nolas, Nollaig Frost, Cigdem Esin, Martin R. Adams and Bahman Baluch. Their work appears in journals such as Qualitative Research, International Journal of Qualitative Methods and International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.