Pieter Emmer

149 total papers · 685 total citations
28 papers, 155 citations indexed

About

Pieter Emmer is a scholar working on Anthropology, Economics and Econometrics and Cultural Studies. According to data from OpenAlex, Pieter Emmer has authored 28 papers receiving a total of 155 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 16 papers in Anthropology, 10 papers in Economics and Econometrics and 7 papers in Cultural Studies. Recurrent topics in Pieter Emmer's work include Colonialism, slavery, and trade (15 papers), Historical Economic and Social Studies (10 papers) and Caribbean history, culture, and politics (6 papers). Pieter Emmer is often cited by papers focused on Colonialism, slavery, and trade (15 papers), Historical Economic and Social Studies (10 papers) and Caribbean history, culture, and politics (6 papers). Pieter Emmer collaborates with scholars based in Netherlands, United States and Poland. Pieter Emmer's co-authors include John Thornton, David Eltis, Wim Klooster, Frank D. Lewis, Philip D. Morgan, Laird W. Bergad, Lorena S. Walsh, Seymour Drescher, Francisco Vidal Luna and Jonathan Israël and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, The International Journal of African Historical Studies and Hispanic American Historical Review.

In The Last Decade

Pieter Emmer

20 papers receiving 103 citations

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author						Papers	Cites
Pieter Emmer	83	52	35	26	19	28	155
Alison Games	90 1.1×	64 1.2×	46 1.3×	26 1.0×	35 1.8×	28	170
Aaron Spencer Fogleman	55 0.7×	61 1.2×	30 0.9×	14 0.5×	34 1.8×	20	129
Nuala Zahedieh	125 1.5×	66 1.3×	123 3.5×	43 1.7×	15 0.8×	23	255
J. R. Oldfield	100 1.2×	103 2.0×	31 0.9×	40 1.5×	50 2.6×	22	220
Lawrence C. Jennings	92 1.1×	49 0.9×	29 0.8×	13 0.5×	43 2.3×	32	171
Rafe Blaufarb	55 0.7×	63 1.2×	26 0.7×	18 0.7×	57 3.0×	27	212
Stephen D. Behrendt	142 1.7×	66 1.3×	73 2.1×	37 1.4×	16 0.8×	23	230
P.C. Emmer	69 0.8×	58 1.1×	32 0.9×	29 1.1×	16 0.8×	28	135
Ned Landsman	31 0.4×	66 1.3×	33 0.9×	16 0.6×	30 1.6×	24	158
Sue Peabody	124 1.5×	81 1.6×	24 0.7×	26 1.0×	36 1.9×	20	224

Countries citing papers authored by Pieter Emmer

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Pieter Emmer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Pieter Emmer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Pieter Emmer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Pieter Emmer

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Pieter Emmer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Pieter Emmer. The network helps show where Pieter Emmer may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Pieter Emmer

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Pieter Emmer. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Pieter Emmer based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Pieter Emmer. Pieter Emmer is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Loading papers...

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact