George Winius
Impact in
- Anthropology top 5%
- Colonialism, slavery, and trade
- Global Maritime and Colonial Histories
- African history and culture studies
- History top 2%
Papers in
- Anthropology 10
- Global Maritime and Colonial Histories 7
- Colonialism, slavery, and trade 5
- Philippine History and Culture 3
-
- Asian Studies and History 3
- Co-authors
- Bailey W. Diffie (3 shared papers)H. V. Livermore (2 shared papers)Johannes Postma (1 shared paper)Pieter Emmer (1 shared paper)Richard B. Ross (1 shared paper)Francis A. Dutra (1 shared paper)F.S. Gaastra (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Itinerario (8 papers)The American Historical Review (3 papers)Pacific Affairs (1 paper)Hispanic American Historical Review (1 paper)The Journal of Asian Studies (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- NetherlandsUnited States
In The Last Decade
George Winius
17 papers receiving 262 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 60
- Anthropology 140
- History 60
- Sociology and Political Science 169
- Political Science and International Relations 81
- Religious studies 17
Countries citing papers authored by George Winius
This map shows the geographic impact of George Winius's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by George Winius with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites George Winius more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by George Winius
This network shows the impact of papers produced by George Winius. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by George Winius. The network helps show where George Winius may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 7 scholars most cited alongside George Winius, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1978 | 186 | |
| 2 | 1978 | 49 | |
| 3 | 1979 | 47 | |
| 4 | 1983 | 14 | |
| 5 | 1994 | 13 | |
| 6 | 1983 | 9 | |
| 7 | 1971 | 7 | |
| 8 | 1968 | 5 | |
| 9 | 1971 | 4 | |
| 10 | 1979 | 2 | |
| 11 | 1972 | 2 | |
| 12 | 1994 | 2 | |
| 13 | 1986 | 1 | |
| 14 | The fall of Portuguese Ceylon, 1638-1656 : military, diplomatic and political aspects in the decline of an empire | 1964 | 1 |
| 15 | 2024 | 1 | |
| 16 | 1981 | 1 | |
| 17 | 1985 | 1 | |
| 18 | 1980 | 1 | |
| 19 | 1981 | 0 |
About George Winius
George Winius is a scholar working on Anthropology, Sociology and Political Science, Education, Political Science and International Relations and History, having authored 19 papers that have together received 346 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Global Maritime and Colonial Histories (7 papers), Colonialism, slavery, and trade (5 papers), Historical Education and Society (3 papers), Asian Studies and History (3 papers), Philippine History and Culture (3 papers), Caribbean history, culture, and politics (2 papers), Medieval Iberian Studies (2 papers) and Early Modern Spanish Literature (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Anthropology (140 citations), History (60 citations), Sociology and Political Science (169 citations), Political Science and International Relations (81 citations) and Religious studies (17 citations). George Winius has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands and United States. Frequent co-authors include Bailey W. Diffie, H. V. Livermore, Johannes Postma, Pieter Emmer, Richard B. Ross, Francis A. Dutra and F.S. Gaastra. Their work appears in journals such as Itinerario, The American Historical Review, Pacific Affairs, Hispanic American Historical Review and The Journal of Asian Studies.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.