Lawrence C. Jennings
- Anthropology top 5%
- Colonialism, slavery, and trade 13
- Global Maritime and Colonial Histories 5
-
- Historical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis 15
- History top 5%
- European Political History Analysis 11
- French Historical and Cultural Studies 4
- Religious studies top 10%
- Caribbean and African Literature and Culture 1
-
- Migration, Identity, and Health 6
-
- Historical Economic and Social Studies 1
Lawrence C. Jennings
24 papers receiving 126 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 28
- Anthropology 93
- History and Philosophy of Science 40
- History 32
- Religious studies 15
- Demography 26
Countries citing papers authored by Lawrence C. Jennings
This map shows the geographic impact of Lawrence C. Jennings's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Lawrence C. Jennings with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lawrence C. Jennings more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Lawrence C. Jennings
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Lawrence C. Jennings. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Lawrence C. Jennings. The network helps show where Lawrence C. Jennings may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 5 scholars most cited alongside Lawrence C. Jennings, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Slavery in the Circuit of Sugar: Martinique and the World Sugar Economy, 1830-1848, by Dale W. Tomich | 2016 | 1 |
| 2 | Fradera Josep M. and Schmidt-Nowara Christopher, editors, Slavery and Antislavery in Spain’s Atlantic Empire, New York and Oxford, Berghahn, 2013 | 2014 | 1 |
| 3 | 2014 | 0 | |
| 4 | 2002 | 0 | |
| 5 | 2001 | 1 | |
| 6 | 1998 | 1 | |
| 7 | 1995 | 4 | |
| 8 | 1995 | 17 | |
| 9 | 1992 | 3 | |
| 10 | 1990 | 2 | |
| 11 | 1990 | 5 | |
| 12 | 1989 | 7 | |
| 13 | 1988 | 31 | |
| 14 | 1980 | 0 | |
| 15 | 1978 | 0 | |
| 16 | 1976 | 17 | |
| 17 | 1976 | 3 | |
| 18 | 1974 | 3 | |
| 19 | 1972 | 0 | |
| 20 | 1970 | 0 |
About Lawrence C. Jennings
Lawrence C. Jennings is a scholar working on History and Philosophy of Science, Anthropology and History, having authored 32 papers that have together received 174 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Historical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis (15 papers), Colonialism, slavery, and trade (13 papers), European Political History Analysis (11 papers), Migration, Identity, and Health (6 papers), Global Maritime and Colonial Histories (5 papers), French Historical and Cultural Studies (4 papers), Historical Economic and Social Studies (1 paper) and Caribbean and African Literature and Culture (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Anthropology (93 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (40 citations) and History (32 citations). Lawrence C. Jennings has collaborated with scholars based in Canada. Frequent co-authors include David Eltis, Seymour Drescher, Paul W. Schroeder, William B. Cohen and Sue Peabody. Their work appears in journals such as The American Historical Review, The International Journal of African Historical Studies and Canadian Journal of African Studies / Revue canadienne des études africaines.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.