Pierre‐Etienne Chabrier
- Physiology top 5%
- Molecular Biology
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience top 5%
- Neurology top 5%
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine top 10%
- Co-authors
- Michel AuguetP. BraquetJean‐Grégoire MarinIsabelle ViossatCaroline Demerlé-PallardyB. SpinnewynMarie-Odile LonchamptBernadette Pignol
- Topics
- Nitric Oxide and Endothelin Effects (23 papers)Ion channel regulation and function (6 papers)Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (6 papers)
- Partner nations
- FranceUnited StatesHungary
In The Last Decade
Pierre‐Etienne Chabrier
45 papers receiving 1.2k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 100
- Physiology 571
- Molecular Biology 374
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 329
- Neurology 217
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 176
Countries citing papers authored by Pierre‐Etienne Chabrier
This map shows the geographic impact of Pierre‐Etienne Chabrier's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Pierre‐Etienne Chabrier with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Pierre‐Etienne Chabrier more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Pierre‐Etienne Chabrier
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Pierre‐Etienne Chabrier. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Pierre‐Etienne Chabrier. The network helps show where Pierre‐Etienne Chabrier may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Pierre‐Etienne Chabrier
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Pierre‐Etienne Chabrier. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Pierre‐Etienne Chabrier based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Pierre‐Etienne Chabrier. Pierre‐Etienne Chabrier is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 45 | |
| 2 | 30 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 15 | |
| 5 | 31 | |
| 6 | 12 | |
| 7 | 7 | |
| 8 | 91 | |
| 9 | 9 | |
| 10 | 9 | |
| 11 | 27 | |
| 12 | 135 | |
| 13 | 14 | |
| 14 | 21 | |
| 15 | 9 | |
| 16 | 24 | |
| 17 | 15 | |
| 18 | 51 | |
| 19 | 6 | |
| 20 | 3 |
About Pierre‐Etienne Chabrier
Pierre‐Etienne Chabrier is a scholar working on Physiology, Biophysics and Neurology, having authored 45 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Nitric Oxide and Endothelin Effects (23 papers), Ion channel regulation and function (6 papers) and Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Physiology (571 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (329 citations) and Neurology (146 citations). Pierre‐Etienne Chabrier has collaborated with scholars based in France, United States and Hungary. Frequent co-authors include Michel Auguet, P. Braquet, Jean‐Grégoire Marin, Isabelle Viossat, Caroline Demerlé-Pallardy, B. Spinnewyn, Marie-Odile Lonchampt, Bernadette Pignol, Saı̈d Sediame and János G. Filep. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Nature Communications and PLoS ONE.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.