Pierre Chaplais
Impact in
Papers in
- Co-authors
- M. K. James (1 shared paper)Édouard Perroy (1 shared paper)Geoffrey Barraclough (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- The English Historical Review (4 papers)Historical Research (1 paper)Revue belge de philologie et d histoire (1 paper)The Economic History Review (1 paper)American Journal of Legal History (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited States
In The Last Decade
Pierre Chaplais
22 papers receiving 67 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 19
- Classics 82
- History 69
- Language and Linguistics 18
- History and Philosophy of Science 7
- Conservation 4
Countries citing papers authored by Pierre Chaplais
This map shows the geographic impact of Pierre Chaplais's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Pierre Chaplais with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Pierre Chaplais more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Pierre Chaplais
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Pierre Chaplais. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Pierre Chaplais. The network helps show where Pierre Chaplais may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 3 scholars most cited alongside Pierre Chaplais, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 25 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1966 | 13 | |
| 2 | English royal documents : King John - Henry VI, 1199-1461 | 1971 | 11 |
| 3 | English medieval diplomatic practice | 1975 | 11 |
| 4 | Essays in medieval diplomacy and administration | 1981 | 10 |
| 5 | English diplomatic practice in the Middle Ages | 2003 | 10 |
| 6 | 1966 | 7 | |
| 7 | 1968 | 7 | |
| 8 | 1969 | 6 | |
| 9 | 1971 | 5 | |
| 10 | The War of Saint-Sardos, 1323-1325 : Gascon correspondence and diplomatic documents | 1954 | 4 |
| 11 | Regesta Regum Anglo-Normannorum, 1066-1154. Vol. II. Regesta Henrici Primi, 1100-1135, | 1957 | 4 |
| 12 | Facsimiles of English royal writs to A.D. 1100 : presented to Vivian Hunter Galbraith | 1957 | 4 |
| 13 | 1965 | 4 | |
| 14 | 1952 | 3 | |
| 15 | 1958 | 3 | |
| 16 | 1957 | 3 | |
| 17 | 1962 | 3 | |
| 18 | 1954 | 2 | |
| 19 | 1955 | 2 | |
| 20 | 1960 | 2 |
About Pierre Chaplais
Pierre Chaplais is a scholar working on History, Classics, Political Science and International Relations, History and Philosophy of Science and Economics and Econometrics, having authored 25 papers that have together received 120 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Medieval Literature and History (11 papers), Historical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis (5 papers), Scottish History and National Identity (5 papers), Historical Economic and Social Studies (3 papers), Historical Studies of British Isles (3 papers), Historical and Archaeological Studies (2 papers), Historical, Literary, and Cultural Studies (2 papers) and European Political History Analysis (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Classics (82 citations), History (69 citations), Language and Linguistics (18 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (7 citations) and Conservation (4 citations). Pierre Chaplais has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include M. K. James, Édouard Perroy and Geoffrey Barraclough. Their work appears in journals such as The English Historical Review, Historical Research, Revue belge de philologie et d histoire, The Economic History Review and American Journal of Legal History.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.