Beryl Manning‐Geist

843 citations
49 papers · 458 indexed · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

Beryl Manning‐Geist

47 papers receiving 453 citations

Peers

Beryl Manning‐Geist
Comparison fields: 5 of 74
  • Reproductive Medicine 178
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 122
  • Oncology 112
  • Surgery 139
  • Economics and Econometrics 75
Replace Katharine M. Esselen with:
Katharine M. Esselen United States
Nathaniel Jones United States
Nicoletta Colombo Italy
Guus Fons Netherlands
Flora Vernooij Netherlands
Margaux J. Kanis United States
Vaagn Andikyan United States
Renee A. Cowan United States
Clare J. Reade Canada
Roni Nitecki United States
Beryl Manning‐Geist relative to Katharine M. Esselen United States Katharine M. Esselen's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Katharine M. Esselen · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Beryl Manning‐Geist

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Beryl Manning‐Geist's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Beryl Manning‐Geist with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Beryl Manning‐Geist more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Beryl Manning‐Geist

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Beryl Manning‐Geist. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Beryl Manning‐Geist. The network helps show where Beryl Manning‐Geist may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Beryl Manning‐Geist, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Beryl Manning‐Geist Line = papers co-authored together Beryl Manning‐Geist links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20250
2 20248
3 20242
4 202312
5 20231
6 20234
7 20235
8 202317
9 202211
10 20224
11 202137
12 202113
13 202141
14 20214
15 20211
16 20216
17 201911
18 201924
19 20199
20 20161

About Beryl Manning‐Geist

Beryl Manning‐Geist is a scholar working on Reproductive Medicine, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Aging, Oncology and Surgery, having authored 49 papers that have together received 458 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment (28 papers), Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments (14 papers), Intraperitoneal and Appendiceal Malignancies (9 papers), Renal cell carcinoma treatment (3 papers), Reproductive Biology and Fertility (3 papers), Chromatin Remodeling and Cancer (3 papers), Endometriosis Research and Treatment (3 papers) and PARP inhibition in cancer therapy (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Reproductive Medicine (178 citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (122 citations), Oncology (112 citations), Surgery (139 citations) and Economics and Econometrics (75 citations). Beryl Manning‐Geist has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Marcela G. del Carmen, Nadeem R. Abu‐Rustum, Ross S. Berkowitz, Allison Gockley, Whitfield B. Growdon, Neil S. Horowitz, Michael J. Worley, Emeline Aviki, Mario M. Leitão and Sushmita Gordhandas. Their work appears in journals such as Gynecologic Oncology, International Journal of Gynecological Cancer, Cancer, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026