Didem Çifçi
About
In The Last Decade
Didem Çifçi
8 papers receiving 164 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 38
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 113
- Artificial Intelligence 103
- Oncology 45
- Cancer Research 37
- Health Informatics 29
Countries citing papers authored by Didem Çifçi
This map shows the geographic impact of Didem Çifçi's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Didem Çifçi with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Didem Çifçi more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Didem Çifçi
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Didem Çifçi. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Didem Çifçi. The network helps show where Didem Çifçi may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Didem Çifçi
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Didem Çifçi. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Didem Çifçi based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Didem Çifçi. Didem Çifçi is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 4 | |
| 5 | 13 | |
| 6 | 41 | |
| 7 | 3 | |
| 8 | 17 | |
| 9 | 7 | |
| 10 | 81 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.