Philotheus Boehner
- Philosophy top 5%
- History and Philosophy of Science top 5%
- Classics top 10%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Artificial Intelligence
- Co-authors
- Ernest A. MoodySaint BonaventureStephen BrownRoy J. DeferrariÉtienne GilsonGedeon GálMarilyn McCord Adams
- Topics
- Classical Philosophy and Thought (7 papers)Medieval Philosophy and Theology (5 papers)Historical Studies in Science (2 papers)
In The Last Decade
Philotheus Boehner
11 papers receiving 76 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 49
- Philosophy 79
- History and Philosophy of Science 30
- Classics 26
- Sociology and Political Science 15
- Artificial Intelligence 12
Countries citing papers authored by Philotheus Boehner
This map shows the geographic impact of Philotheus Boehner's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philotheus Boehner with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philotheus Boehner more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Philotheus Boehner
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philotheus Boehner. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philotheus Boehner. The network helps show where Philotheus Boehner may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Philotheus Boehner
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Philotheus Boehner. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Philotheus Boehner based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Philotheus Boehner. Philotheus Boehner is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Itinerarium mentis in Deum : Latin text from the Quaracchi edition | 0 |
| 2 | The Journey of the Soul into God: Itinerarium Mentis in Deum | 0 |
| 3 | Venerabilis inceptoris Guillelmi de Ockham Summa logicae | 0 |
| 4 | Collected Articles on Ockham | 15 |
| 5 | Opera dubia et spuria Venerabili inceptori Guillelmo de Ockham adscripta | 0 |
| 6 | 4 | |
| 7 | The Journey of the Mind to God | 10 |
| 8 | Philosophical writings : a selection | 34 |
| 9 | 0 | |
| 10 | 4 | |
| 11 | Saint Bonaventure's Itinerarium mentis in Deum | 6 |
| 12 | De puritate artis logicae tractatus longior : with a revised edition of the Tractatus brevior | 17 |
| 13 | Christliche Philosophie von Ihren Anfängen Bis Nikolaus von Cues | 3 |
| 14 | 23 | |
| 15 | 10 | |
| 16 | 9 | |
| 17 | 3 | |
| 18 | De Puritate Artis Logicae | 7 |
About Philotheus Boehner
Philotheus Boehner is a scholar working on History and Philosophy of Science, Philosophy and Classics, having authored 18 papers that have together received 145 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Classical Philosophy and Thought (7 papers), Medieval Philosophy and Theology (5 papers) and Historical Studies in Science (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Classics (26 citations), Philosophy (79 citations) and History and Philosophy of Science (30 citations). Frequent co-authors include Ernest A. Moody, Saint Bonaventure, Stephen Brown, Roy J. Deferrari, Étienne Gilson, Gedeon Gál, Stephen Brown and Marilyn McCord Adams. Their work appears in journals such as The Philosophical Review, The Journal of Philosophy and Philosophy and Phenomenological Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.