Ernest A. Moody
- Philosophy top 2%
- History and Philosophy of Science top 2%
- Anthropology top 10%
- Archeology top 10%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
- Co-authors
- Philotheus BoehnerA. R. TurquetteJulius WeinbergNicholas RescherJean BuridanHenry B. VeatchMarshall ClagettDesmond Paul Henry
- Topics
- Classical Philosophy and Thought (9 papers)Historical Philosophy and Science (9 papers)Medieval and Classical Philosophy (9 papers)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Ernest A. Moody
26 papers receiving 140 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 44
- Philosophy 129
- History and Philosophy of Science 61
- Anthropology 30
- Archeology 20
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 17
Countries citing papers authored by Ernest A. Moody
This map shows the geographic impact of Ernest A. Moody's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ernest A. Moody with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ernest A. Moody more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Ernest A. Moody
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ernest A. Moody. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ernest A. Moody. The network helps show where Ernest A. Moody may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ernest A. Moody
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ernest A. Moody. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ernest A. Moody based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ernest A. Moody. Ernest A. Moody is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | The Medieval Science of Weights : treatises ascribed to Euclid, Archimedes, Thabit ibn Qurra, Jordanus de Nemore and Blasius of Parma | 0 |
| 2 | 4 | |
| 3 | Quaestiones super libris quattuor de caelo et mundo | 9 |
| 4 | 5 | |
| 5 | 12 | |
| 6 | 13 | |
| 7 | Expositionis in libros artis logicae prooemium et expositio in librum porphyrii de praedicabilibus | 2 |
| 8 | 3 | |
| 9 | 6 | |
| 10 | The medieval science of weights (scientia de ponderibus) : treatises ascribed to Euclid, Archimedes, Thabit ibn Qurra, Jordanus de Nemore and Blasius of Parma | 7 |
| 11 | 12 | |
| 12 | 4 | |
| 13 | 1 | |
| 14 | 2 | |
| 15 | 14 | |
| 16 | 13 | |
| 17 | 2 | |
| 18 | 1 | |
| 19 | The medieval science of weights (scientia e ponderibus) | 1 |
| 20 | 4 |
About Ernest A. Moody
Ernest A. Moody is a scholar working on History and Philosophy of Science, Philosophy and Anthropology, having authored 30 papers that have together received 213 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Classical Philosophy and Thought (9 papers), Historical Philosophy and Science (9 papers) and Medieval and Classical Philosophy (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (61 citations), Philosophy (129 citations) and Theoretical Computer Science (5 citations). Ernest A. Moody has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Philotheus Boehner, A. R. Turquette, Julius Weinberg, Nicholas Rescher, Jean Buridan, Henry B. Veatch, Marshall Clagett, Desmond Paul Henry, Joseph T. Clark and Marilyn McCord Adams. Their work appears in journals such as The Philosophical Review, The Journal of Philosophy and The Philosophical Quarterly.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.