Phillip Kim

788 citations
25 papers · 274 indexed · h-index 7
Topics
Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences (3 papers)Cancer, Hypoxia, and Metabolism (2 papers)Pelvic floor disorders treatments (2 papers)

In The Last Decade

Phillip Kim

22 papers receiving 268 citations

Peers

Phillip Kim
Comparison fields: 5 of 96
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 70
  • Materials Chemistry 67
  • Molecular Biology 63
  • Organic Chemistry 41
  • Biological Psychiatry 25
Replace Maha Zewail‐Foote with:
Maha Zewail‐Foote United States
Juha Muilu Finland
Sangyun Lee United States
China
Christopher T. Boughter United States
Dmitry M. Gakamsky Israel
Farai Gombedza United States
Е. В. Мартынова Russia
S. Aonuma Japan
Barbara Hammack United States
Phillip Kim relative to Maha Zewail‐Foote United States Maha Zewail‐Foote's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×
Maha Zewail‐Foote · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Phillip Kim

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Phillip Kim's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Phillip Kim with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Phillip Kim more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Phillip Kim

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Phillip Kim. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Phillip Kim. The network helps show where Phillip Kim may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Phillip Kim

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Phillip Kim. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Phillip Kim based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Phillip Kim. Phillip Kim is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 0
2 2
3 1
4 1
5 3
6 1
7 60
8 1
9 10
10 18
11 1
12 1
13 1
14 75
15
Biopsy Interpretation of the Bladder
13
16 6
17
Family Religious Involvement and the Quality of Family Relationships for Early Adolescents. A Research Report of the National Study of Youth and Religion.
5
18
Family religious involvement and the quality of family relationships for early adolescents
1
19 1
20 38

About Phillip Kim

Phillip Kim is a scholar working on Management of Technology and Innovation, Health and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, having authored 25 papers that have together received 274 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences (3 papers), Cancer, Hypoxia, and Metabolism (2 papers) and Pelvic floor disorders treatments (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biological Psychiatry (25 citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (12 citations) and Management of Technology and Innovation (23 citations). Phillip Kim has collaborated with scholars based in United States, South Korea and Bangladesh. Frequent co-authors include Keriann M. Backus, Howard E. Aldrich, Sanford P. Markey, Melvyn P. Heyes, Eila C. Skinner, Cory R. Dean, James Hone, Takashi Taniguchi, Andrea F. Young and Suyong Jung. Their work appears in journals such as Physical Review Letters, Journal of Biological Chemistry and Environmental Science & Technology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026