Phillip E. Pope

2.0k citations
49 papers · 1.4k indexed · h-index 21

Phillip E. Pope

46 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers

Phillip E. Pope
Comparison fields: 5 of 116
  • Forestry 225
  • Soil Science 351
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 422
  • Agronomy and Crop Science 242
  • Global and Planetary Change 256
Replace A.J.S. McDonald with:
A.J.S. McDonald Sweden
José Paulo Molin Brazil
Hermann Blum Switzerland
César Fernández‐Quintanilla Spain
Roberto Confalonieri Italy
Ian J. Yule New Zealand
Rick Bennett Australia
Baofeng Su China
George S. Innis United States
Riyad Ismail South Africa
Phillip E. Pope relative to A.J.S. McDonald Sweden A.J.S. McDonald's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×11.3×
A.J.S. McDonald · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Phillip E. Pope

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Phillip E. Pope's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Phillip E. Pope with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Phillip E. Pope more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Phillip E. Pope

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Phillip E. Pope. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Phillip E. Pope. The network helps show where Phillip E. Pope may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Phillip E. Pope, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Phillip E. Pope Line = papers co-authored together Phillip E. Pope links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 202219
2 202120
3
Sliced Wasserstein Auto-Encoders.
201829
4 200219
5
The Role of Fine Root Dynamics in the N and P Cycles of Regenerating Upland Oak-Hickory Forests
19981
6
The effects of pruning treatments and initial seedling morphology on northern red oak seedling growth
19931
7 199222
8 199113
9 199037
10
Short-Rotation Plantations
19894
11 198813
12 19883
13 19884
14 198720
15 198524
16 198461
17 198111
18 19805
19 197425
20 19747

About Phillip E. Pope

Phillip E. Pope is a scholar working on Soil Science, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Agronomy and Crop Science, Forestry and Global and Planetary Change, having authored 49 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics (18 papers), Seedling growth and survival studies (16 papers), Forest ecology and management (10 papers), Bioenergy crop production and management (8 papers), Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions (8 papers), Forest Management and Policy (8 papers), Forest Biomass Utilization and Management (6 papers) and Plant nutrient uptake and metabolism (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Forestry (225 citations), Soil Science (351 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (422 citations), Agronomy and Crop Science (242 citations) and Global and Planetary Change (256 citations). Phillip E. Pope has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Malawi and China. Frequent co-authors include Charles E. Martin, Soheil Kolouri, Mohammad Rostami, H. Hoffmann, Felix Ponder, A. R. Gillespie, Travis Idol, William R. Chaney, S. Jose and John R. Seifert. Their work appears in journals such as Soil Science Society of America Journal, Canadian Journal of Forest Research, Forest Ecology and Management, Agroforestry Systems and Journal of Environmental Quality.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026