Phillip D. Kramer

633 citations
15 papers · 456 · h-index 10

Impact in

  • Neurology top 5%
    • Vestibular and auditory disorders
    • Peripheral Neuropathies and Disorders
    • Cerebral Venous Sinus Thrombosis
    • Glaucoma and retinal disorders

Papers in

Phillip D. Kramer

15 papers receiving 420 citations

Peers

Phillip D. Kramer
Comparison fields: 5 of 58
  • Neurology 232
  • Ophthalmology 161
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 305
  • Sensory Systems 40
  • Neurology 97
Replace Anand C. Joshi with:
Anand C. Joshi United States
V Honrubia United States
Stephen E. Thurston United States
Ryoji Kanayama Japan
Sheryl S. Wizov United States
Christian Van Nechel France
Mohamed A. Hamid United States
John G. Oas United States
Mark J. Morrow United States
Silvia Colnaghi Italy
Phillip D. Kramer relative to Anand C. Joshi United States Anand C. Joshi's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
Anand C. Joshi · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Phillip D. Kramer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Phillip D. Kramer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Phillip D. Kramer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Phillip D. Kramer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Phillip D. Kramer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Phillip D. Kramer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Phillip D. Kramer. The network helps show where Phillip D. Kramer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Phillip D. Kramer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Phillip D. Kramer Line = papers co-authored together Phillip D. Kramer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

15 of 15 papers shown
#Work
1 200174
2 200068
3 199664
4 200356
5 200348
6 200840
7
A versatile stereoscopic visual display system for vestibular and oculomotor research.
199827
8 200323
9 199818
10 199810
11 20007
12 19987
13 20026
14 20195
15 20043

About Phillip D. Kramer

Phillip D. Kramer is a scholar working on Neurology, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Ophthalmology, Cognitive Neuroscience and Neurology, having authored 15 papers that have together received 456 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Vestibular and auditory disorders (12 papers), Ophthalmology and Eye Disorders (8 papers), Glaucoma and retinal disorders (5 papers), Visual perception and processing mechanisms (5 papers), Cerebral Venous Sinus Thrombosis (2 papers), Advanced Optical Imaging Technologies (2 papers), Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies (2 papers) and Gaze Tracking and Assistive Technology (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Neurology (232 citations), Ophthalmology (161 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (305 citations), Sensory Systems (40 citations) and Neurology (97 citations). Phillip D. Kramer has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Switzerland and India. Frequent co-authors include David S. Zee, Elliot M. Frohman, Teresa C. Frohman, Dominik Straumann, Richard B. Dewey, Mark Shelhamer, R. John Leigh, Vallabh E. Das, D. Solomon and Michael K. Racke. Their work appears in journals such as Neurology, Experimental Brain Research, Journal of Vestibular Research, Acta Oto-Laryngologica and American Journal of Ophthalmology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact