Mark Shelhamer

2.5k total citations
107 papers, 1.7k citations indexed

About

Mark Shelhamer is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Neurology and Physiology. According to data from OpenAlex, Mark Shelhamer has authored 107 papers receiving a total of 1.7k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 50 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 44 papers in Neurology and 23 papers in Physiology. Recurrent topics in Mark Shelhamer's work include Vestibular and auditory disorders (44 papers), Visual perception and processing mechanisms (34 papers) and Spaceflight effects on biology (23 papers). Mark Shelhamer is often cited by papers focused on Vestibular and auditory disorders (44 papers), Visual perception and processing mechanisms (34 papers) and Spaceflight effects on biology (23 papers). Mark Shelhamer collaborates with scholars based in United States, Germany and Netherlands. Mark Shelhamer's co-authors include David S. Zee, Aaron L. Wong, Wilsaan M. Joiner, Faisal Karmali, Dale Roberts, Laurence R. Young, Richard A. Clendaniel, H. Stevie Tan, Michael C. Schubert and Caroline Tiliket and has published in prestigious journals such as PLoS ONE, Journal of Neurophysiology and Scientific Reports.

In The Last Decade

Mark Shelhamer

105 papers receiving 1.6k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Mark Shelhamer United States 23 812 720 322 298 237 107 1.7k
K. E. Money Canada 21 514 0.6× 587 0.8× 265 0.8× 284 1.0× 117 0.5× 46 1.5k
Fred E. Guedry United States 25 763 0.9× 882 1.2× 330 1.0× 144 0.5× 161 0.7× 77 1.5k
Gilles Clément France 31 807 1.0× 554 0.8× 210 0.7× 1.4k 4.8× 68 0.3× 155 2.6k
I. P. Howard Canada 23 1.5k 1.8× 316 0.4× 144 0.4× 72 0.2× 213 0.9× 41 2.0k
A. J. Benson Czechia 16 511 0.6× 500 0.7× 144 0.4× 117 0.4× 72 0.3× 40 940
Thomas Haslwanter Switzerland 23 640 0.8× 1.2k 1.7× 884 2.7× 60 0.2× 557 2.4× 69 2.0k
Leland S. Stone United States 33 2.5k 3.0× 672 0.9× 157 0.5× 70 0.2× 495 2.1× 102 3.1k
Faisal Karmali United States 17 498 0.6× 496 0.7× 103 0.3× 96 0.3× 46 0.2× 38 817
Henrietta L. Galiana Canada 21 937 1.2× 1.2k 1.6× 345 1.1× 52 0.2× 361 1.5× 93 1.9k
J.A.M. Van Gisbergen Netherlands 35 3.1k 3.8× 931 1.3× 246 0.8× 38 0.1× 288 1.2× 63 3.6k

Countries citing papers authored by Mark Shelhamer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Shelhamer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Shelhamer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Shelhamer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Shelhamer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Shelhamer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Shelhamer. The network helps show where Mark Shelhamer may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mark Shelhamer

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mark Shelhamer. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mark Shelhamer based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mark Shelhamer. Mark Shelhamer is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Chiaberge, M., Anna‐Maria Liphardt, Christine Wang, et al.. (2025). Plyometric training increases thickness and volume of knee articular cartilage in mice. npj Microgravity. 11(1). 5–5. 1 indexed citations
2.
Millar, Jennifer L., et al.. (2025). Vestibular patients generate more regular head movements than healthy individuals during gaze-stabilization exercises. Scientific Reports. 15(1). 1173–1173. 1 indexed citations
3.
Sarma, Mallika S. & Mark Shelhamer. (2024). The human biology of spaceflight. American Journal of Human Biology. 36(3). e24048–e24048. 3 indexed citations
4.
Alwood, Joshua S., Ajitkumar P. Mulavara, Janani Iyer, et al.. (2023). Circuits and Biomarkers of the Central Nervous System Relating to Astronaut Performance: Summary Report for a NASA-Sponsored Technical Interchange Meeting. Life. 13(9). 1852–1852. 5 indexed citations
5.
Szocik, Konrad, Mark Shelhamer, Martin Braddock, et al.. (2021). Future space missions and human enhancement: Medical and ethical challenges. Futures. 133. 102819–102819. 16 indexed citations
6.
Ervin, Ann‐Margret, Michael C. Schubert, Americo A. Migliaccio, et al.. (2021). Incremental Velocity Error as a New Treatment in Vestibular Rehabilitation (INVENT VPT) Trial: study protocol for a randomized controlled crossover trial. Trials. 22(1). 908–908. 1 indexed citations
7.
Szocik, Konrad, Chris Impey, Mark Shelhamer, et al.. (2020). Visions of a Martian future. Futures. 117. 102514–102514. 14 indexed citations
8.
Schubert, Michael C., Yoav Gimmon, Jennifer L. Millar, et al.. (2018). Veterans have greater variability in their perception of binocular alignment. PLoS ONE. 13(12). e0209622–e0209622. 2 indexed citations
9.
Wong, Aaron L., et al.. (2017). Inter-Trial Correlations in Predictive-Saccade Endpoints: Fractal Scaling Reflects Differential Control along Task-Relevant and Orthogonal Directions. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience. 11. 100–100. 1 indexed citations
10.
Shelhamer, Mark. (2014). Power analysis and the systems approach to experiment design. Journal of Applied Physiology. 116(9). 1 indexed citations
11.
Joiner, Wilsaan M. & Mark Shelhamer. (2008). A model of time estimation and error feedback in predictive timing behavior. Journal of Computational Neuroscience. 26(1). 119–138. 14 indexed citations
12.
Karmali, Faisal & Mark Shelhamer. (2008). Compensating for camera translation in video eye-movement recordings by tracking a representative landmark selected automatically by a genetic algorithm. Journal of Neuroscience Methods. 176(2). 157–165. 4 indexed citations
13.
Joiner, Wilsaan M. & Mark Shelhamer. (2006). Pursuit and saccadic tracking exhibit a similar dependence on movement preparation time. Experimental Brain Research. 173(4). 572–586. 18 indexed citations
14.
Shelhamer, Mark, et al.. (2005). Context‐Specific Adaptation of Saccade Gain Is Enhanced with Rest Intervals Between Changes in Context State. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 1039(1). 166–175. 17 indexed citations
15.
Karmali, Faisal & Mark Shelhamer. (2005). Automatic detection of camera translation in eye video recordings using multiple methods. PubMed. 3. 1525–1528. 3 indexed citations
16.
Joiner, Wilsaan M., Mark Shelhamer, & Sarah H. Ying. (2005). Cerebellar Influence in Oculomotor Phase‐Transition Behavior. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 1039(1). 536–539. 4 indexed citations
17.
Walker, Mark F., Mark Shelhamer, & David S. Zee. (2003). Eye-position dependence of torsional velocity during interaural translation, horizontal pursuit, and yaw-axis rotation in humans. Vision Research. 44(6). 613–620. 26 indexed citations
18.
Shelhamer, Mark, et al.. (1998). Prediction of the sequence of optokinetic nystagmus eye movements reveals deterministic structure in reflexive oculomotor behavior. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering. 45(5). 668–670. 6 indexed citations
19.
20.
Shelhamer, Mark. (1992). Correlation dimension of optokinetic nystagmus as evidence of chaos in the oculomotor system. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering. 39(12). 1319–1321. 16 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026