Philip Wang

12.6k citations
52 papers · 8.7k indexed · 3 hit papers · h-index 22

Philip Wang

49 papers receiving 8.4k citations

Hit Papers

Research Domain Criteria (RDoC...198220261996201120102005198210002.0k3.0k4.0k

Peers

Philip Wang
Comparison fields: 5 of 184
  • Clinical Psychology 2.9k
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 2.1k
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 1.9k
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 1.9k
  • Social Psychology 1.8k
Replace Raymond F. Anton with:
Raymond F. Anton United States
Charles P. O’Brien United States
Helen M. Pettinati United States
Victor Hesselbrock United States
Enrique Baca‐García Spain
RN United States
Henry R. Kranzler United States
Martin Preisig Switzerland
Roger Mulder New Zealand
Karl Mann Germany
Philip Wang relative to Raymond F. Anton United States Raymond F. Anton's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.6×
Raymond F. Anton · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Philip Wang

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Philip Wang's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philip Wang with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philip Wang more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Philip Wang

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philip Wang. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philip Wang. The network helps show where Philip Wang may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Philip Wang

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Philip Wang. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Philip Wang based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Philip Wang. Philip Wang is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 0
2 1
3 0
4 1
5 1
6 8
7 11
8 7
9 1
10 3
11 81
12
Research Domain Criteria (RDoC): Toward a New Classification Framework for Research on Mental Disordersbreakdown →
4492
13 167
14
Prevalence and Treatment of Mental Disorders, 1990 to 2003breakdown →
1318
15 409
16 211
17 91
18 308
19 2
20 39

About Philip Wang

Philip Wang is a scholar working on Applied Psychology, Social Psychology and Developmental Neuroscience, having authored 52 papers that have together received 8.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mental Health Treatment and Access (9 papers), Schizophrenia research and treatment (5 papers) and Pharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (2.1k citations), Clinical Psychology (2.9k citations) and Biological Psychiatry (327 citations). Philip Wang has collaborated with scholars based in United States, China and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Thomas R. Insel, Robert Heinssen, Kevin J. Quinn, Marjorie A. Garvey, Bruce N. Cuthbert, Charles A. Sanislow, Daniel S. Pine, Ronald C. Kessler, F. Peter Guengerich and Richard G. Frank. Their work appears in journals such as New England Journal of Medicine, Annals of Internal Medicine and American Journal of Psychiatry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026