Philip W. Davis

64 total papers · 685 total citations
33 papers, 402 citations indexed

About

Philip W. Davis is a scholar working on Language and Linguistics, Linguistics and Language and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics. According to data from OpenAlex, Philip W. Davis has authored 33 papers receiving a total of 402 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 10 papers in Language and Linguistics, 7 papers in Linguistics and Language and 5 papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics. Recurrent topics in Philip W. Davis's work include Linguistic Variation and Morphology (7 papers), Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation (4 papers) and Spanish Linguistics and Language Studies (4 papers). Philip W. Davis is often cited by papers focused on Linguistic Variation and Morphology (7 papers), Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation (4 papers) and Spanish Linguistics and Language Studies (4 papers). Philip W. Davis collaborates with scholars based in United States, Canada and Switzerland. Philip W. Davis's co-authors include Ronald D. Graft, L. W. Aukerman, Penny Lee, Robert A. Oetjen, M. Onellion, F. Gozzo, M. Marsi, F. Lévy, S. La Rosa and Y. Hwu and has published in prestigious journals such as Physical Review Letters, Journal of Applied Physics and Language.

In The Last Decade

Philip W. Davis

30 papers receiving 337 citations

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author						Papers	Cites
Philip W. Davis	110	107	105	104	51	33	402
Robert L. Cooper	7 0.1×	69 0.6×	11 0.1×	83 0.8×	8 0.2×	16	425
Harold L. Davis	24 0.2×	169 1.6×	51 0.5×	3 0.0×	32 0.6×	18	360
I. Ciccarello	29 0.3×	166 1.6×	108 1.0×	7 0.1×	24 0.5×	25	374
Bernard Vidal	38 0.3×	62 0.6×	12 0.1×	10 0.1×	14 0.3×	48	351
André Fuhrmann	63 0.6×	69 0.6×	21 0.2×	2 0.0×	52 1.0×	25	361
Richard Davis	56 0.5×	117 1.1×	31 0.3×	2 0.0×	31 0.6×	18	364
М. Р. Трунин	53 0.5×	143 1.3×	372 3.5×	8 0.1×	124 2.4×	53	440
M. Steinberg	44 0.4×	124 1.2×	40 0.4×	1 0.0×	34 0.7×	25	356
R. A. Marriott	48 0.4×	266 2.5×	6 0.1×	10 0.1×	4 0.1×	27	427
Steven Moffat	136 1.2×	211 2.0×	159 1.5×	1 0.0×	36 0.7×	22	419

Countries citing papers authored by Philip W. Davis

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Philip W. Davis's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philip W. Davis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philip W. Davis more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Philip W. Davis

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philip W. Davis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philip W. Davis. The network helps show where Philip W. Davis may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Philip W. Davis

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Philip W. Davis. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Philip W. Davis based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Philip W. Davis. Philip W. Davis is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Loading papers...

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact