Philip W. Buck
- Political Science and International Relations top 5%
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- History top 10%
- Strategy and Management
- Economics and Econometrics
- Co-authors
- Carl J. FriedrichZbigniew BrzezińskiLeon D. EpsteinLester W. MilbrathRobert Tracy McKenzieRoy PierceC. M. WoodhouseR. R. Palmer
- Topics
- Political and Economic history of UK and US (2 papers)Political Theory and Influence (1 paper)World Wars: History, Literature, and Impact (1 paper)
- Cited by
- Political Science and International RelationsSociology and Political SciencePublic Administration
- Journals
- Stanford Law ReviewMidwest Journal of Political ScienceThe Western Political Quarterly
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Philip W. Buck
15 papers receiving 185 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 43
- Political Science and International Relations 163
- Sociology and Political Science 137
- History 20
- Strategy and Management 18
- Economics and Econometrics 17
Countries citing papers authored by Philip W. Buck
This map shows the geographic impact of Philip W. Buck's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philip W. Buck with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philip W. Buck more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Philip W. Buck
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philip W. Buck. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philip W. Buck. The network helps show where Philip W. Buck may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Philip W. Buck
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Philip W. Buck. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Philip W. Buck based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Philip W. Buck. Philip W. Buck is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | How Conservatives think | 5 |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 3 | |
| 4 | 3 | |
| 5 | 3 | |
| 6 | 22 | |
| 7 | 11 | |
| 8 | 3 | |
| 9 | 3 | |
| 10 | 4 | |
| 11 | 4 | |
| 12 | Control of foreign relations in modern nations | 1 |
| 13 | 172 | |
| 14 | 3 | |
| 15 | 10 | |
| 16 | 14 | |
| 17 | 1 |
About Philip W. Buck
Philip W. Buck is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, History and Infectious Diseases, having authored 17 papers that have together received 263 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Political and Economic history of UK and US (2 papers), Political Theory and Influence (1 paper) and World Wars: History, Literature, and Impact (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Political Science and International Relations (163 citations), Sociology and Political Science (137 citations) and Public Administration (9 citations). Philip W. Buck has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Carl J. Friedrich, Zbigniew Brzeziński, Leon D. Epstein, Lester W. Milbrath, Robert Tracy McKenzie, Roy Pierce, C. M. Woodhouse, R. R. Palmer, Werner J. Feld and David Butler. Their work appears in journals such as Stanford Law Review, Midwest Journal of Political Science and The Western Political Quarterly.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.