Philip S. Holzman
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 0.5%
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 0.5%
- Clinical Psychology top 1%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 1%
- Philosophy top 0.2%
- Co-authors
- Deborah L. LevySteven MatthysseLeonard R. ProctorSohee ParkYue ChenMark F. LenzenwegerDominic W. HughesAnne B. Sereno
- Topics
- Schizophrenia research and treatment (39 papers)Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (18 papers)Mental Health and Psychiatry (17 papers)
- Journals
- ScienceProceedings of the National Academy of SciencesJournal of Personality and Social Psychology
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanadaNorway
In The Last Decade
Philip S. Holzman
133 papers receiving 5.3k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 141
- Cognitive Neuroscience 2.8k
- Psychiatry and Mental health 2.4k
- Clinical Psychology 1.2k
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 926
- Philosophy 652
Countries citing papers authored by Philip S. Holzman
This map shows the geographic impact of Philip S. Holzman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philip S. Holzman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philip S. Holzman more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Philip S. Holzman
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philip S. Holzman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philip S. Holzman. The network helps show where Philip S. Holzman may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Philip S. Holzman
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Philip S. Holzman. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Philip S. Holzman based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Philip S. Holzman. Philip S. Holzman is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 10 | |
| 2 | 25 | |
| 3 | 60 | |
| 4 | 40 | |
| 5 | 91 | |
| 6 | 10 | |
| 7 | 42 | |
| 8 | 4 | |
| 9 | 29 | |
| 10 | 77 | |
| 11 | 21 | |
| 12 | 47 | |
| 13 | 11 | |
| 14 | 42 | |
| 15 | 112 | |
| 16 | 122 | |
| 17 | 67 | |
| 18 | Theorie der psychoanalytischen Technik | 5 |
| 19 | Psychology versus metapsychology : psychoanalytic essays in memory of George S. Klein | 71 |
| 20 | 11 |
About Philip S. Holzman
Philip S. Holzman is a scholar working on General Psychology, Psychiatry and Mental health and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 143 papers that have together received 5.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Schizophrenia research and treatment (39 papers), Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (18 papers) and Mental Health and Psychiatry (17 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (2.4k citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (2.8k citations) and General Psychology (124 citations). Philip S. Holzman has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Norway. Frequent co-authors include Deborah L. Levy, Steven Matthysse, Leonard R. Proctor, Sohee Park, Yue Chen, Mark F. Lenzenweger, Dominic W. Hughes, Anne B. Sereno, George S. Klein and Ken Nakayama. Their work appears in journals such as Science, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences and Journal of Personality and Social Psychology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.