J. Alexander Bodkin
- Pharmacology top 2%
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 5%
- Clinical Psychology top 5%
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience top 5%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 5%
- Co-authors
- Jay D. AmsterdamJonathan ColeGwen L. ZornbergScott E. LukasJames I. HudsonHarrison G. PopeRoss J. BaldessariniRobert Lasser
- Topics
- Treatment of Major Depression (13 papers)Electroconvulsive Therapy Studies (6 papers)Schizophrenia research and treatment (6 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesNetherlandsSweden
In The Last Decade
J. Alexander Bodkin
37 papers receiving 1.2k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 119
- Pharmacology 469
- Psychiatry and Mental health 385
- Clinical Psychology 314
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 274
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 190
Countries citing papers authored by J. Alexander Bodkin
This map shows the geographic impact of J. Alexander Bodkin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J. Alexander Bodkin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J. Alexander Bodkin more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by J. Alexander Bodkin
This network shows the impact of papers produced by J. Alexander Bodkin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J. Alexander Bodkin. The network helps show where J. Alexander Bodkin may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of J. Alexander Bodkin
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of J. Alexander Bodkin. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of J. Alexander Bodkin based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with J. Alexander Bodkin. J. Alexander Bodkin is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 | |
| 2 | 12 | |
| 3 | 10 | |
| 4 | 134 | |
| 5 | 10 | |
| 6 | 21 | |
| 7 | 3 | |
| 8 | 4 | |
| 9 | 77 | |
| 10 | 58 | |
| 11 | 37 | |
| 12 | 126 | |
| 13 | 18 | |
| 14 | 19 | |
| 15 | 40 | |
| 16 | 32 | |
| 17 | 116 | |
| 18 | 34 | |
| 19 | 9 | |
| 20 | 269 |
About J. Alexander Bodkin
J. Alexander Bodkin is a scholar working on Biological Psychiatry, Psychiatry and Mental health and Pharmacology, having authored 38 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Treatment of Major Depression (13 papers), Electroconvulsive Therapy Studies (6 papers) and Schizophrenia research and treatment (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biological Psychiatry (176 citations), Pharmacology (469 citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (385 citations). J. Alexander Bodkin has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Netherlands and Sweden. Frequent co-authors include Jay D. Amsterdam, Jonathan Cole, Gwen L. Zornberg, Scott E. Lukas, James I. Hudson, Harrison G. Pope, Ross J. Baldessarini, Robert Lasser, David M. Gardner and James D. Wines. Their work appears in journals such as JAMA, American Journal of Psychiatry and The British Journal of Psychiatry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.