Philip Roe
Impact in
- Family Practice top 5%
- Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
-
- scientometrics and bibliometrics research
Papers in
- Oncology 4
- Global Cancer Incidence and Screening 4
-
- Health and Medical Research Impacts 2
- Co-authors
- Grant Lewison (9 shared papers)Richard Sullivan (5 shared papers)Peter Maguire (1 shared paper)Simon Jones (1 shared paper)David P. Goldberg (1 shared paper)Clive E. Hyde (1 shared paper)Tariq Sethi (1 shared paper)Peter Boyle (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Scientometrics (4 papers)Gerontology (2 papers)Psychological Medicine (2 papers)Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine (1 paper)British Journal of Cancer (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomAustraliaUnited States
In The Last Decade
Philip Roe
12 papers receiving 422 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 110
- Family Practice 43
- Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 31
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 119
- General Health Professions 93
- Psychiatry and Mental health 52
Countries citing papers authored by Philip Roe
This map shows the geographic impact of Philip Roe's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philip Roe with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philip Roe more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Philip Roe
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philip Roe. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philip Roe. The network helps show where Philip Roe may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Philip Roe, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2016 | 177 | |
| 2 | 1978 | 144 | |
| 3 | 2008 | 47 | |
| 4 | 2012 | 24 | |
| 5 | 2011 | 15 | |
| 6 | 2016 | 12 | |
| 7 | 2015 | 7 | |
| 8 | 2013 | 6 | |
| 9 | 2018 | 4 | |
| 10 | 2023 | 4 | |
| 11 | 1982 | 2 | |
| 12 | 1982 | 1 | |
| 13 | Basic skills capacity in Wales: provider and learner perceptions | 2008 | 1 |
About Philip Roe
Philip Roe is a scholar working on Oncology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Sociology and Political Science, Economics and Econometrics and Education, having authored 13 papers that have together received 444 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Global Cancer Incidence and Screening (4 papers), Economic and Financial Impacts of Cancer (2 papers), Diversity and Career in Medicine (2 papers), Health and Medical Research Impacts (2 papers), Health Policy Implementation Science (1 paper), Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment (1 paper), Mental Health and Psychiatry (1 paper) and Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Family Practice (43 citations), Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (31 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (119 citations), General Health Professions (93 citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (52 citations). Philip Roe has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and United States. Frequent co-authors include Grant Lewison, Richard Sullivan, Peter Maguire, Simon Jones, David P. Goldberg, Clive E. Hyde, Tariq Sethi, Peter Boyle, Ajay Aggarwal and Matthew Peters. Their work appears in journals such as Scientometrics, Gerontology, Psychological Medicine, Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine and British Journal of Cancer.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.