Philip Roche

3.6k citations
76 papers · 2.8k · h-index 31

Impact in

Papers in

Philip Roche

75 papers receiving 2.6k citations

Peers

Philip Roche
Comparison fields: 5 of 130
  • Ecological Modeling 325
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 773
  • Global and Planetary Change 1.2k
  • Ecology 993
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 533
Replace Kelvin S.‐H. Peh with:
Kelvin S.‐H. Peh United Kingdom
Corina Başnou Spain
Lisa Norton United Kingdom
Carlos A. Guerra Germany
Pedro Martins da Silva Portugal
Jaume Terradas Spain
Jiajia Liu China
WRI
Bruno Fady France
Naeem China
Philip Roche relative to Kelvin S.‐H. Peh United Kingdom Kelvin S.‐H. Peh's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Kelvin S.‐H. Peh · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Philip Roche

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Philip Roche's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philip Roche with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philip Roche more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Philip Roche

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philip Roche. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philip Roche. The network helps show where Philip Roche may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Philip Roche, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Philip Roche Line = papers co-authored together Philip Roche links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 76 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2015196
2 2007143
3 2007138
4 2009131
5 2004122
6 2018116
7 2002105
8 201899
9 200691
10 201771
11 201768
12 199466
13 202065
14 201360
15 201859
16 199357
17 201857
18 200555
19 200054
20 201551

About Philip Roche

Philip Roche is a scholar working on Nature and Landscape Conservation, Global and Planetary Change, Ecology, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics and Plant Science, having authored 76 papers that have together received 2.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (24 papers), Land Use and Ecosystem Services (20 papers), Plant and animal studies (15 papers), Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management (9 papers), Species Distribution and Climate Change (7 papers), Avian ecology and behavior (7 papers), Botany and Plant Ecology Studies (7 papers) and Water Quality Monitoring and Analysis (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ecological Modeling (325 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (773 citations), Global and Planetary Change (1.2k citations), Ecology (993 citations) and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (533 citations). Philip Roche has collaborated with scholars based in France, Spain and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Thierry Tatoni, Ilse R. Geijzendorffer, C. Sylvie Campagne, Éric Vidal, Berta Martín‐López, Vincenzo Penteriani, Sophie Gachet, Frédéric Mèdail, Thierry Dutoit and Laurent Bergès. Their work appears in journals such as Ecological Indicators, Ozone Science and Engineering, Acta Oecologica, Landscape Ecology and Ecoscience.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact