Thomas Wrbka

3.9k citations
58 papers · 2.8k indexed · h-index 27

Impact in

Papers in

Thomas Wrbka

58 papers receiving 2.7k citations

Peers

Thomas Wrbka
Comparison fields: 5 of 108
  • Global and Planetary Change 1.6k
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 848
  • Ecological Modeling 287
  • Ecology 918
  • General Agricultural and Biological Sciences 281
Replace Nicolas Dendoncker with:
Nicolas Dendoncker Belgium
Laetitia M. Navarro Germany
Andrés Etter Colombia
Jacqueline Loos Germany
José A. González Spain
Gregorio Gavier-Pizarro Argentina
Cristián Echeverría Chile
Irina Herzon Finland
Ângela Lomba Portugal
Christian Levers Germany
Thomas Wrbka relative to Nicolas Dendoncker Belgium Nicolas Dendoncker's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
Nicolas Dendoncker · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Wrbka

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Wrbka's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Wrbka with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Wrbka more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Wrbka

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Wrbka. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Wrbka. The network helps show where Thomas Wrbka may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Wrbka, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas Wrbka Line = papers co-authored together Thomas Wrbka links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20237
2 20203
3 20192
4 201829
5 201743
6 201451
7 20142
8 2012219
9 20123
10 2012170
11 201134
12
Implications of landscape heterogeneity on ecological values in selected types of agriculture landscapes.
20091
13 2007138
14 2007172
15 200539
16 20058
17 200327
18 20023
19 19992
20 19983

About Thomas Wrbka

Thomas Wrbka is a scholar working on Nature and Landscape Conservation, Global and Planetary Change, Horticulture, Ecological Modeling and Ecology, having authored 58 papers that have together received 2.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Land Use and Ecosystem Services (28 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (16 papers), Forest Management and Policy (12 papers), Botany and Plant Ecology Studies (10 papers), Ecology, Conservation, and Geographical Studies (9 papers), Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management (5 papers), Peatlands and Wetlands Ecology (5 papers) and Urban Green Space and Health (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Global and Planetary Change (1.6k citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (848 citations), Ecological Modeling (287 citations), Ecology (918 citations) and General Agricultural and Biological Sciences (281 citations). Thomas Wrbka has collaborated with scholars based in Austria, Portugal and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Stefan Schindler, Johannes Peterseil, Harald G. Zechmeister, Κonstantinos Poirazidis, Norbert Sauberer, Dietmar Moser, Helmut Haberl, C.A. Mücher, Christoph Plutzar and Vassiliki Kati. Their work appears in journals such as Ecological Indicators, Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment, Landscape Ecology, Land Use Policy and Innovation The European Journal of Social Science Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026