Philip P. Boucher
- Anthropology top 5%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Cultural Studies top 5%
- History and Philosophy of Science top 5%
- History top 5%
- Co-authors
- Karen Ordahl KuppermanWilliam F. KeeganWilliam B. RizzoĬrving RouseMichael CartwrightPeter HulmeStanley L. EngermanPaul Lachance
- Topics
- Colonialism, slavery, and trade (8 papers)Historical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis (6 papers)Cuban History and Society (5 papers)
- Journals
- The American Historical ReviewThe Journal of Interdisciplinary HistoryHispanic American Historical Review
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Philip P. Boucher
17 papers receiving 95 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 47
- Anthropology 107
- Sociology and Political Science 46
- Cultural Studies 40
- History and Philosophy of Science 28
- History 28
Countries citing papers authored by Philip P. Boucher
This map shows the geographic impact of Philip P. Boucher's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philip P. Boucher with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philip P. Boucher more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Philip P. Boucher
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philip P. Boucher. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philip P. Boucher. The network helps show where Philip P. Boucher may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Philip P. Boucher
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Philip P. Boucher. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Philip P. Boucher based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Philip P. Boucher. Philip P. Boucher is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 16 | |
| 2 | 11 | |
| 3 | 10 | |
| 4 | The Libertine Colony: Creolization in the Early French Caribbean | 0 |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 2 | |
| 7 | 29 | |
| 8 | 1 | |
| 9 | 50 | |
| 10 | 1 | |
| 11 | 1 | |
| 12 | 7 | |
| 13 | 3 | |
| 14 | 6 | |
| 15 | 2 | |
| 16 | 1 | |
| 17 | 3 | |
| 18 | 2 | |
| 19 | 3 | |
| 20 | 0 |
About Philip P. Boucher
Philip P. Boucher is a scholar working on History and Philosophy of Science, Anthropology and Cultural Studies, having authored 23 papers that have together received 183 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Colonialism, slavery, and trade (8 papers), Historical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis (6 papers) and Cuban History and Society (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Anthropology (107 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (28 citations) and Cultural Studies (40 citations). Philip P. Boucher has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Karen Ordahl Kupperman, William F. Keegan, William B. Rizzo, Ĭrving Rouse, Michael Cartwright, Peter Hulme, Stanley L. Engerman, Paul Lachance, Patricia Galloway and Laura Schechter. Their work appears in journals such as The American Historical Review, The Journal of Interdisciplinary History and Hispanic American Historical Review.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.