James H. Sweet

800 total citations
18 papers, 224 citations indexed

About

James H. Sweet is a scholar working on Anthropology, Sociology and Political Science and Religious studies. According to data from OpenAlex, James H. Sweet has authored 18 papers receiving a total of 224 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 9 papers in Anthropology, 6 papers in Sociology and Political Science and 3 papers in Religious studies. Recurrent topics in James H. Sweet's work include Colonialism, slavery, and trade (9 papers), History of Medicine and Tropical Health (3 papers) and History of Colonial Brazil (3 papers). James H. Sweet is often cited by papers focused on Colonialism, slavery, and trade (9 papers), History of Medicine and Tropical Health (3 papers) and History of Colonial Brazil (3 papers). James H. Sweet collaborates with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. James H. Sweet's co-authors include Tejúmólá Ọláníyan, Indrani Chatterjee, Sandra E. Greene, Joanne Barker, Karin Wulf, Annette Gordon‐Reed, Alan Mikhail, Eve M. Troutt Powell and Daryl Michael Scott and has published in prestigious journals such as The American Historical Review, The William and Mary Quarterly and Past & Present.

In The Last Decade

James H. Sweet

16 papers receiving 142 citations

Peers

James H. Sweet
Comparison fields: 5 of 43
  • Anthropology 136
  • Sociology and Political Science 69
  • Cultural Studies 52
  • Religious studies 35
  • History 21
Replace Hendrik Kraay with:
Hendrik Kraay Canada
Jane Landers United States
Alida C. Metcalf United States
Ben Vinson United States
Stephanie Smallwood United States
Ida Altman United States
Marisa J. Fuentes United States
Roy Arthur Glasgow Canada
Sue Peabody United States
Edward L. Cox United States
Hendrik Kraay Canada View profile →
Citations per field, relative to James H. Sweet
James H. Sweet · 1×
Citations per year, relative to James H. Sweet
James H. Sweet · 1×

Countries citing papers authored by James H. Sweet

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James H. Sweet's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James H. Sweet with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James H. Sweet more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James H. Sweet

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James H. Sweet. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James H. Sweet. The network helps show where James H. Sweet may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of James H. Sweet

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of James H. Sweet. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of James H. Sweet based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with James H. Sweet. James H. Sweet is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
# Work Indexed citations
1 0
2 1
3 12
4 12
5
Domingos Álvares, African Healing, and the Intellectual History of the Atlantic World
42
6 6
7 12
8 15
9 7
10
The Devil and the Land of the Holy Cross: Witchcraft, Slavery, and Popular Religion in Colonial Brazil
1
11 2
12 2
13 2
14 2
15 7
16 6
17 3
18 92

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026