Philip L. Wright

1.1k citations
40 papers · 671 indexed · h-index 15

Philip L. Wright

37 papers receiving 505 citations

Peers

Philip L. Wright
Comparison fields: 5 of 99
  • Ecology 265
  • Ecological Modeling 42
  • Ophthalmology 89
  • Agronomy and Crop Science 91
  • Nutrition and Dietetics 97
Replace L. D. Fay with:
L. D. Fay United States
Howard L. Rhinehart United States
David Kenny United States
Ruth J. McCartney United Kingdom
William Youatt United States
Molly E. Church United States
David H. Thomas United Kingdom
Allen E. Anderson United States
Patrick K. Schoff United States
Robert B. Dahlgren United States
Philip L. Wright relative to L. D. Fay United States L. D. Fay's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×20×29.7×
L. D. Fay · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Philip L. Wright

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Philip L. Wright's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philip L. Wright with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philip L. Wright more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Philip L. Wright

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philip L. Wright. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philip L. Wright. The network helps show where Philip L. Wright may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 21 scholars most cited alongside Philip L. Wright, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Philip L. Wright Line = papers co-authored together Philip L. Wright links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 19966
2 198897
3
BARRED OWL SPECIMEN RECORDS FOR MONTANA
19871
4 19841
5
Effects of model eye irritants on corneal proteins and water content
19766
6 19766
7 19764
8 19739
9 19711
10 197114
11 19706
12 196821
13
EFFECT OF DIETARY STRONTIUM ON REPRODUCTIVE PERFORMANCE OF THE LAYING HEN.
19679
14 196636
15 196413
16 196414
17 196314
18 19624
19 19624
20 19593

About Philip L. Wright

Philip L. Wright is a scholar working on Ecological Modeling, Agronomy and Crop Science and Nutrition and Dietetics, having authored 40 papers that have together received 671 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ecology and biodiversity studies (6 papers), Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology (6 papers), Selenium in Biological Systems (5 papers), Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock (5 papers), Rangeland and Wildlife Management (5 papers), Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (5 papers), Reproductive Physiology in Livestock (4 papers) and Botany, Ecology, and Taxonomy Studies (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ecology (265 citations), Ecological Modeling (42 citations) and Ophthalmology (89 citations). Philip L. Wright has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and China. Frequent co-authors include Μ. C. Bell, Randolph L. Peterson, C. P. Wilkinson, Hal D. Balyeat, Robert Rausch, Robert S. Hoffman, Gino J. Marco, John A. Morrison, Frank R. Mraz and G.L. Romoser. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Mammalogy, Journal of Wildlife Management, Journal of Nutrition, Journal of Animal Science and Experimental Biology and Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026