Philip Kreager

34 papers receiving 429 citations

Peers

Philip Kreager
Comparison fields: 5 of 86
  • Sociology and Political Science 233
  • Demography 136
  • General Health Professions 103
  • Gender Studies 95
  • Economics and Econometrics 88
Replace Jona Schellekens with:
Jona Schellekens Israel
Lucia Pozzi Italy
Heather Joshi United Kingdom
E. Beekink Netherlands
P. Ekamper Netherlands
Hilde Bras Netherlands
R. S. Davies United Kingdom
Tom Fricke United States
Barbara Boyle Torrey United States
Alice Goldstein United States
Philip Kreager relative to Jona Schellekens Israel Jona Schellekens's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.2×
Jona Schellekens · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Philip Kreager

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Philip Kreager's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philip Kreager with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philip Kreager more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Philip Kreager

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philip Kreager. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philip Kreager. The network helps show where Philip Kreager may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Philip Kreager

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Philip Kreager. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Philip Kreager based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Philip Kreager. Philip Kreager is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 0
2 7
3 1
4
Fertility, Conjuncture, Difference : Anthropological Approaches to the Heterogeneity of Modern Fertility Declines
3
5 3
6 10
7 2
8
Humanities graduates and the British economy: the hidden impact
6
9 2
10 3
11 4
12 25
13 59
14 3
15 23
16 53
17
The demographic future of Europe--facts figures policies. Results of the Population Policy Acceptance Study (PPAS)
7
18
Ageing without children: European and Asian perspectives
42
19 2
20 14

About Philip Kreager

Philip Kreager is a scholar working on Gender Studies, History and Philosophy of Science and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 36 papers that have together received 505 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving (11 papers), Demographic Trends and Gender Preferences (6 papers) and Migration and Labor Dynamics (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Demography (136 citations), Gender Studies (95 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (233 citations). Philip Kreager has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Indonesia and United States. Frequent co-authors include Elisabeth Schröder‐Butterfill, Jean-Claude Chesnais, N. L. Tranter, Tri Budi W. Rahardjo, Eef Hogervorst, Bob Woods, Robert McC. Netting, Yvonne Suzy Handajani, Eric J. Arnould and Sayeed Unisa. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, Population and Development Review and Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026