Philip Joos

1.2k total citations · 1 hit paper
26 papers, 834 citations indexed

About

Philip Joos is a scholar working on Accounting, Strategy and Management and Finance. According to data from OpenAlex, Philip Joos has authored 26 papers receiving a total of 834 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 20 papers in Accounting, 11 papers in Strategy and Management and 11 papers in Finance. Recurrent topics in Philip Joos's work include Corporate Finance and Governance (15 papers), Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance (11 papers) and Financial Reporting and Valuation Research (7 papers). Philip Joos is often cited by papers focused on Corporate Finance and Governance (15 papers), Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance (11 papers) and Financial Reporting and Valuation Research (7 papers). Philip Joos collaborates with scholars based in Netherlands, United States and Canada. Philip Joos's co-authors include Elizabeth Demers, Baruch Lev, Christof Beuselinck, Sofie Van der Meulen, Edith Leung, Inder K. Khurana, Alexei Zhdanov, Hubert Ooghe, Nilabhra Bhattacharya and Jerold L. Zimmerman and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Accounting Research, The Accounting Review and Financial Management.

In The Last Decade

Philip Joos

26 papers receiving 780 citations

Hit Papers

align trajectories

What are hit papers?

Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.

ESG did not immunize stocks during the COVID‐19 crisis, but investments in intangible assets did

2021 277 citations Elizabeth Demers, Philip Joos et al. Journal of Business Finance &amp Accounting profile →

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Philip Joos Netherlands	13	559	440	290	260	84	26	834
Ilanit Gavious Israel	16	626 1.1×	388 0.9×	173 0.6×	149 0.6×	84 1.0×	42	832
Rui Zhong Australia	8	652 1.2×	412 0.9×	161 0.6×	457 1.8×	116 1.4×	13	900
Mustafa Ciftci United Arab Emirates	15	552 1.0×	380 0.9×	225 0.8×	207 0.8×	24 0.3×	26	733
Sarah Shaikh United States	6	511 0.9×	329 0.7×	219 0.8×	155 0.6×	81 1.0×	13	744
Searat Ali Australia	14	585 1.0×	308 0.7×	221 0.8×	290 1.1×	81 1.0×	37	871
Syed Shams Australia	14	390 0.7×	453 1.0×	289 1.0×	167 0.6×	175 2.1×	47	794
Zenu Sharma United States	11	309 0.6×	299 0.7×	251 0.9×	143 0.6×	202 2.4×	24	621
Samuel Fosu United Kingdom	15	782 1.4×	477 1.1×	214 0.7×	248 1.0×	145 1.7×	25	1.0k
Maria Loumioti United States	12	440 0.8×	188 0.4×	256 0.9×	380 1.5×	64 0.8×	23	716

Countries citing papers authored by Philip Joos

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Philip Joos's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philip Joos with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philip Joos more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Philip Joos

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philip Joos. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philip Joos. The network helps show where Philip Joos may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Philip Joos

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Philip Joos. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Philip Joos based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Philip Joos. Philip Joos is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

1.

Joos, Philip, et al.. (2022). ESG Transparency of Private Equity and Debt Firms. SSRN Electronic Journal. 2 indexed citations

2.

Demers, Elizabeth, et al.. (2021). ESG did not immunize stocks during the COVID‐19 crisis, but investments in intangible assets did. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting. 48(3-4). 433–462. 277 indexed citations breakdown →

3.

Demers, Elizabeth, et al.. (2020). ESG Didn’t Immunize Stocks Against the Covid-19 Market Crash. SSRN Electronic Journal. 38 indexed citations

4.

Joos, Philip & Lex Meijdam. (2019). Innovation in Higher Education: Needed and Feasible. Other publications TiSEM. 2 indexed citations

5.

Beuselinck, Christof, Philip Joos, Inder K. Khurana, & Sofie Van der Meulen. (2017). Which Analysts Benefited Most from Mandatory IFRS Adoption in Europe?. Journal of International Accounting Research. 16(3). 171–190. 9 indexed citations

6.

Leung, Edith & Philip Joos. (2012). Investor Perceptions of Potential IFRS Adoption in the United States. SSRN Electronic Journal. 6 indexed citations

7.

Joos, Philip & Edith Leung. (2012). Investor Perceptions of Potential IFRS Adoption in the United States. The Accounting Review. 88(2). 577–609. 67 indexed citations

8.

Beuselinck, Christof, Philip Joos, Inder K. Khurana, & Sofie Van der Meulen. (2010). Mandatory Adoption of IFRS and Analysts? Forecasts Information Properties. SSRN Electronic Journal. 20 indexed citations

9.

Beuselinck, Christof, Philip Joos, Inder K. Khurana, & Sofie Van der Meulen. (2009). Mandatory IFRS Reporting and Stock Price Informativeness. SSRN Electronic Journal. 76 indexed citations

10.

Bhattacharya, Nilabhra, Elizabeth Demers, & Philip Joos. (2009). The Relevance of Accounting Information in a Stock Market Bubble: Evidence from Internet IPOs. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting. 37(3-4). 291–321. 27 indexed citations

11.

Joos, Philip & Alexei Zhdanov. (2008). Earnings and Equity Valuation in the Biotech Industry: Theory and Evidence. Financial Management. 37(3). 431–460. 28 indexed citations

12.

Joos, Philip & Alexei Zhdanov. (2007). Earnings and Equity Valuation in the Biotech Industry: Theory and Evidence. SSRN Electronic Journal. 9 indexed citations

13.

Demers, Elizabeth & Philip Joos. (2006). IPO Failure Risk. SSRN Electronic Journal. 8 indexed citations

14.

Bhattacharya, Neil, Elizabeth Demers, & Philip Joos. (2006). Learning from History to Predict Shakeouts in Nascent Stage Industries: the Role of Accounting Information. SSRN Electronic Journal. 3 indexed citations

15.

Joos, Philip & Alexei Zhdanov. (2005). Examining the Price-Earnings Relation in a Real Options Framework with Investor Learning. SSRN Electronic Journal. 1 indexed citations

16.

Joos, Philip, Andrew J. Leone, & Jerold L. Zimmerman. (2003). Selecting CEOs: Matching the person to the job. RePEc: Research Papers in Economics. 16 indexed citations

17.

Joos, Philip. (2003). Discussion—The Usefulness of Biotechnology Firms' Drug Development Status in the Evaluation of Research and Development Costs. Journal of Accounting Auditing & Finance. 18(1). 197–206. 8 indexed citations

18.

Joos, Philip. (2001). Explaining cross-sectional differences in unrecognized net assets. 5 indexed citations

19.

Joos, Philip, et al.. (1998). Methodologie bij het opstellen en beoordelen van kredietclassificatiemodellen. Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University). 43(1). 3–48. 11 indexed citations

20.

Ooghe, Hubert, et al.. (1994). Towards an improved method of evaluation of financial distress models and presentation of their results. 4 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact