ESG did not immunize stocks during the COVID‐19 crisis, but investments in intangible assets did

277 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 2021, received 277 indexed citations. Written by Elizabeth Demers, Philip Joos and Baruch Lev covering the research area of Strategy and Management, Economics and Econometrics and Accounting. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Strategy and Management (183 citations), Economics and Econometrics (161 citations) and Accounting (82 citations). Published in Journal of Business Finance & Accounting.

Countries where authors are citing ESG did not immunize stocks during the COVID‐19 crisis, but investments in intangible assets did

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of ESG did not immunize stocks during the COVID‐19 crisis, but investments in intangible assets did. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by ESG did not immunize stocks during the COVID‐19 crisis, but investments in intangible assets did with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites ESG did not immunize stocks during the COVID‐19 crisis, but investments in intangible assets did more than expected).

Fields of papers citing ESG did not immunize stocks during the COVID‐19 crisis, but investments in intangible assets did

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of ESG did not immunize stocks during the COVID‐19 crisis, but investments in intangible assets did. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the ESG did not immunize stocks during the COVID‐19 crisis, but investments in intangible assets did.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1111/jbfa.12523.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for the paper Widespread sampling biases in herbaria revealed from large‐scale digitization Breakdown of academic impact, for the paper Mammalian Transient Receptor Potential TRPA1 Channels: From Structure to Disease Breakdown of academic impact, for the paper Indirect plant defense against insect herbivores: a review Breakdown of academic impact, for the paper Viral hepatitis and liver cancer Breakdown of academic impact, for the paper Event-triggered control for discrete-time systems Breakdown of academic impact, for the paper Glaucoma detection based on deep convolutional neural network Breakdown of academic impact, for the paper Transformer Transducer: A Streamable Speech Recognition Model with Transformer Encoders and RNN-T Loss Breakdown of academic impact, for the paper DAIR-V2X: A Large-Scale Dataset for Vehicle-Infrastructure Cooperative 3D Object Detection Breakdown of academic impact, for the paper True grit and genetics: Predicting academic achievement from personality. Breakdown of academic impact, for the paper Allergic granulomatosis, allergic angitis and periarteritis nodosa
Rankless by CCL
2026