Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
High-temperature electronics - a role for wide bandgap semiconductors?
2002811 citationsPhilip G. Neudeck, Robert S. Okojie et al.profile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Philip G. Neudeck
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Philip G. Neudeck's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philip G. Neudeck with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philip G. Neudeck more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Philip G. Neudeck
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philip G. Neudeck. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philip G. Neudeck. The network helps show where Philip G. Neudeck may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Philip G. Neudeck
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Philip G. Neudeck.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Philip G. Neudeck based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Philip G. Neudeck. Philip G. Neudeck is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Kremic, Tibor, Gary W. Hunter, Philip G. Neudeck, et al.. (2018). Long-Life In-Situ Solar System Explorer (LLISSE) Probe Development. Lunar and Planetary Science Conference. 2796.2 indexed citations
5.
Kremic, Tibor, Gary W. Hunter, Philip G. Neudeck, et al.. (2017). Long-Life In-Situ Solar System Explorer (LLISSE) Probe Concept and Enabling High Temperature Electronics. Lunar and Planetary Science Conference. 2986.4 indexed citations
Devaty, Robert P., Michael Dudley, T. Paul Chow, & Philip G. Neudeck. (2012). Silicon Carbide and Related Materials 2011. Trans Tech Publications Ltd. eBooks.8 indexed citations
9.
Devaty, Robert P., et al.. (2012). Silicon carbide and related materials 2011 : selected, peer reviewed papers from the 14th International Conference on Silicon Carbide and Related Materials 2011 (ICSCRM 2011), September 11-16, 2011, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.1 indexed citations
Neudeck, Philip G.. (2003). Improved Silicon Carbide Crystals Grown From Atomically Flat Surfaces. NASA Technical Reports Server (NASA).
15.
Hunter, Gary W., Philip G. Neudeck, Gustave C. Fralick, et al.. (2002). Development of Microfabricated Chemical Gas Sensors and Sensor Arrays for Aerospace Applications.1 indexed citations
16.
Hunter, Gary W., Philip G. Neudeck, Robert S. Okojie, et al.. (2002). Development of SiC Gas Sensor Systems. NASA STI/Recon Technical Report N. 3. 7872.7 indexed citations
17.
Chen, Liang-Yü, Gary W. Hunter, & Philip G. Neudeck. (2000). Thin and Thick Films Materials Based Interconnection Technology for 500 C Operation. NASA Technical Reports Server (NASA).2 indexed citations
18.
Hunter, Gary W., Philip G. Neudeck, Qiong Wu, et al.. (1998). Chemical Gas Sensors for Aeronautics and Space Applications III. Sensors.4 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.