Philip Dickison

521 total citations
19 papers, 384 citations indexed

About

Philip Dickison is a scholar working on Issues, ethics and legal aspects, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Management Science and Operations Research. According to data from OpenAlex, Philip Dickison has authored 19 papers receiving a total of 384 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 7 papers in Issues, ethics and legal aspects, 5 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and 4 papers in Management Science and Operations Research. Recurrent topics in Philip Dickison's work include Nursing Diagnosis and Documentation (5 papers), Patient Safety and Medication Errors (4 papers) and Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare (4 papers). Philip Dickison is often cited by papers focused on Nursing Diagnosis and Documentation (5 papers), Patient Safety and Medication Errors (4 papers) and Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare (4 papers). Philip Dickison collaborates with scholars based in United States, India and Finland. Philip Dickison's co-authors include Kathie Lasater, Katie Anne Adamson, Roger Levine, William E. Brown, Darlene Russ‐Eft, Ada Woo, Xiao Luo, Do Young ‍Kim, David Hostler and Henry E. Wang and has published in prestigious journals such as Applied Psychological Measurement, Journal of Nursing Education and Human Resource Development Quarterly.

In The Last Decade

Philip Dickison

17 papers receiving 324 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Philip Dickison United States 10 161 132 81 77 69 19 384
KT Waxman United States 9 250 1.6× 133 1.0× 108 1.3× 70 0.9× 119 1.7× 25 396
Carmen La Cerra Italy 10 129 0.8× 115 0.9× 114 1.4× 63 0.8× 37 0.5× 20 367
Helen Bellchambers Australia 9 247 1.5× 164 1.2× 142 1.8× 90 1.2× 72 1.0× 17 455
Chang‐Chiao Hung Taiwan 10 116 0.7× 77 0.6× 97 1.2× 63 0.8× 84 1.2× 27 356
Jin‐Hwa Park South Korea 6 313 1.9× 150 1.1× 154 1.9× 64 0.8× 84 1.2× 19 507
Cynthia Blum United States 10 246 1.5× 135 1.0× 114 1.4× 83 1.1× 71 1.0× 22 440
Barbara Wilson-Keates Canada 8 232 1.4× 106 0.8× 96 1.2× 50 0.6× 70 1.0× 20 319
Joan M. Kavanagh United States 5 194 1.2× 155 1.2× 127 1.6× 93 1.2× 81 1.2× 6 394
Juyeon Bae South Korea 9 234 1.5× 118 0.9× 61 0.8× 145 1.9× 53 0.8× 15 416
Krista A. White United States 9 116 0.7× 103 0.8× 128 1.6× 76 1.0× 47 0.7× 22 387

Countries citing papers authored by Philip Dickison

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Philip Dickison's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philip Dickison with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philip Dickison more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Philip Dickison

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philip Dickison. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philip Dickison. The network helps show where Philip Dickison may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Philip Dickison

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Philip Dickison. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Philip Dickison based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Philip Dickison. Philip Dickison is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
1.
Dickison, Philip, et al.. (2024). Evaluating the Importance of Clinical Judgment in Entry-Level Nursing. Journal of Nursing Education. 63(3). 156–162.
2.
Nielsen, Ann, et al.. (2022). A National Report on Clinical Judgment Model Use in Prelicensure Nursing Curricula. Nursing Education Perspectives. 44(1). 4–10. 15 indexed citations
3.
Dickison, Philip, Katie Anne Adamson, & Kathie Lasater. (2020). NCSBN Clinical Judgment Measurement Model Clarification. Journal of Nursing Education. 59(7). 365–365. 9 indexed citations
4.
‍Kim, Do Young, et al.. (2019). Building a Method for Writing Clinical Judgment Items for Entry-Level Nursing Exams. 20. 21–36. 36 indexed citations
5.
Dickison, Philip, Katie Anne Adamson, & Kathie Lasater. (2019). Integrating the National Council of State Boards of Nursing Clinical Judgment Model Into Nursing Educational Frameworks. Journal of Nursing Education. 58(2). 72–78. 111 indexed citations
6.
Luo, Xiao, Doyoung Kim, & Philip Dickison. (2017). Projection-Based Stopping Rules for Computerized Adaptive Testing in Licensure Testing. Applied Psychological Measurement. 42(4). 275–290. 5 indexed citations
7.
Dickison, Philip, et al.. (2016). Assessing Higher-Order Cognitive Constructs by Using an Information-Processing Framework. 17(1). 1–19. 31 indexed citations
8.
Williams, Nicole, et al.. (2014). NCLEX and Entry-Level Nurse Characteristics. Journal of Nursing Regulation. 5(2). 45–49. 4 indexed citations
9.
Williams, Nicole, et al.. (2014). Validating the NCLEX-RN Test Plan: Comparing Practice Analysis Data. Journal of Nursing Regulation. 5(3). 39–43. 4 indexed citations
10.
Woo, Ada, et al.. (2013). The Impact of Extended Time Accommodations on Differential Item Functioning in High-Stakes Licensure Examinations. Journal of Nursing Regulation. 3(4). 10–14. 1 indexed citations
11.
Dickison, Philip, et al.. (2012). Adding Normal Laboratory Values to Nurse Competence Examinations: Effects on Item Difficulty. Journal of Nursing Regulation. 3(1). 40–43. 1 indexed citations
12.
Dickison, Philip, et al.. (2012). Best Practices for Writing Test Items. Journal of Nursing Regulation. 3(2). 35–39. 12 indexed citations
13.
Dickison, Philip & Ada Woo. (2011). 2009 TUNING Analysis: A Comparison of U.S. and International Nursing Educational Competencies. Journal of Nursing Regulation. 2(1). 50–55. 4 indexed citations
14.
Woo, Ada, Philip Dickison, & John H.A.L. de Jong. (2010). Setting an English Language Proficiency Passing Standard for Entry-Level Nursing Practice Using the Pearson Test of English Academic. Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS). 3 indexed citations
15.
Russ‐Eft, Darlene, Philip Dickison, & Roger Levine. (2008). Examining career success of minority and women emergency medical technicians (EMTs): A LEADS project. Human Resource Development Quarterly. 19(4). 281–298. 10 indexed citations
16.
Dickison, Philip, et al.. (2006). Program Accreditation Effect on Paramedic Credentialing Examination Success Rate. Prehospital Emergency Care. 10(2). 224–228. 24 indexed citations
17.
Pirrallo, Ronald G., Roger Levine, & Philip Dickison. (2005). Behavioral Health Risk Factors of United States Emergency Medical Technicians: The LEADS Project. Prehospital and Disaster Medicine. 20(4). 235–242. 13 indexed citations
18.
Russ‐Eft, Darlene, Philip Dickison, & Roger Levine. (2005). Instructor quality affecting emergency medical technician (EMT) preparedness: a LEADS project*. International Journal of Training and Development. 9(4). 256–270. 20 indexed citations
19.
Brown, William E., et al.. (2002). L ONGITUDINAL E MERGENCY M EDICAL T ECHNICIAN A TTRIBUTE AND D EMOGRAPHIC S TUDY (LEADS): A N I NTERIM R EPORT. Prehospital Emergency Care. 6(4). 433–439. 81 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026