RM Grounds

7.0k total citations
65 papers, 4.5k citations indexed

About

RM Grounds is a scholar working on Surgery, Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine. According to data from OpenAlex, RM Grounds has authored 65 papers receiving a total of 4.5k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 30 papers in Surgery, 30 papers in Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine and 29 papers in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine. Recurrent topics in RM Grounds's work include Anesthesia and Sedative Agents (26 papers), Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (25 papers) and Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy (25 papers). RM Grounds is often cited by papers focused on Anesthesia and Sedative Agents (26 papers), Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (25 papers) and Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy (25 papers). RM Grounds collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and India. RM Grounds's co-authors include R.M. Venn, Andrew Rhodes, Ed Bennett, Rupert M. Pearse, Deborah Dawson, Richard Venn, Michael K. Morgan, Jayne Fawcett, Philip J. Newman and Michael D. Karol and has published in prestigious journals such as The Lancet, Critical Care Medicine and British journal of surgery.

In The Last Decade

RM Grounds

65 papers receiving 4.3k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
RM Grounds United Kingdom 29 2.2k 2.1k 1.8k 1.5k 1.0k 65 4.5k
Yi‐Ju Li United States 36 2.2k 1.0× 458 0.2× 2.4k 1.3× 1.8k 1.2× 867 0.9× 89 5.0k
Olivier Langeron France 36 2.0k 0.9× 2.6k 1.2× 1.6k 0.9× 2.3k 1.5× 1.3k 1.3× 162 6.5k
George Djaiani Canada 29 1.3k 0.6× 821 0.4× 1.4k 0.8× 1.1k 0.7× 573 0.6× 86 3.0k
Charles W. Hogue United States 54 3.4k 1.6× 1.4k 0.7× 4.6k 2.5× 2.2k 1.4× 1.1k 1.1× 191 9.1k
L. Lindgren Finland 40 2.3k 1.1× 1.9k 0.9× 1.4k 0.7× 436 0.3× 523 0.5× 175 4.9k
Robert N. Sladen United States 36 1.3k 0.6× 969 0.5× 1.0k 0.6× 965 0.6× 223 0.2× 128 3.8k
Leif Saager United States 31 1.5k 0.7× 1.3k 0.6× 1.6k 0.9× 1.1k 0.7× 701 0.7× 97 4.0k
Jae‐Kwang Shim South Korea 29 1.3k 0.6× 585 0.3× 1.2k 0.7× 605 0.4× 380 0.4× 200 3.1k
César Aldecoa Spain 16 1.5k 0.7× 444 0.2× 1.2k 0.7× 1.3k 0.8× 402 0.4× 54 3.3k
Pierre Foëx United Kingdom 34 2.2k 1.0× 1.2k 0.6× 2.9k 1.6× 276 0.2× 410 0.4× 194 4.5k

Countries citing papers authored by RM Grounds

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of RM Grounds's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by RM Grounds with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites RM Grounds more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by RM Grounds

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by RM Grounds. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by RM Grounds. The network helps show where RM Grounds may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of RM Grounds

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of RM Grounds. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of RM Grounds based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with RM Grounds. RM Grounds is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Aya, Hollmann D., Andrew Rhodes, Nick Fletcher, RM Grounds, & Maurizio Cecconi. (2015). Transient stop-flow arm arterial–venous equilibrium pressure measurement: determination of precision of the technique. Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing. 30(1). 55–61. 17 indexed citations
2.
Cecconi, Maurizio, Giacomo Monti, Mark Hamilton, et al.. (2012). Efficacy of functional hemodynamic parameters in predicting fluid responsiveness with pulse power analysis in surgical patients.. PubMed. 78(5). 527–33. 33 indexed citations
3.
Al-Subaie, Nawaf, Tim Reynolds, Alyson K. Myers, et al.. (2010). C-reactive protein as a predictor of outcome after discharge from the intensive care: a prospective observational study. British Journal of Anaesthesia. 105(3). 318–325. 38 indexed citations
4.
Kirwan, Christopher J., Terry Lee, David W. Holt, et al.. (2009). Using midazolam to monitor changes in hepatic drug metabolism in critically ill patients. Intensive Care Medicine. 35(7). 1271–1275. 19 indexed citations
6.
Pearse, Rupert M., Deborah Dawson, Jayne Fawcett, et al.. (2005). Changes in central venous saturation after major surgery, and association with outcome. Critical Care. 9(6). R694–9. 146 indexed citations
7.
Tilley, Robert, et al.. (2004). A prospective study into the use of NT-proBNP measurements in critically ill patients. Clinical Intensive Care. 15(1). 31–36. 1 indexed citations
8.
Raobaikady, R & RM Grounds. (2004). The role of activated recombinant factor VII (rFVIIa) in acute severe bleeding. Clinical Intensive Care. 15(4). 115–117. 1 indexed citations
9.
Venn, R.M., Philip J. Newman, & RM Grounds. (2003). A phase II study to evaluate the efficacy of dexmedetomidine for sedation in the medical intensive care unit. Intensive Care Medicine. 29(2). 201–207. 147 indexed citations
10.
Sirker, Alexander, Andrew Rhodes, RM Grounds, & Ed Bennett. (2002). Acid−base physiology: the ‘traditional’ and the ‘modern’ approaches. Anaesthesia. 57(4). 348–356. 78 indexed citations
11.
Venn, R.M. & RM Grounds. (2001). Comparison between dexmedetomidine and propofol for sedation in the intensive care unit: patient and clinician perceptions †. British Journal of Anaesthesia. 87(5). 684–690. 273 indexed citations
12.
Venn, R.M., Annie G. Bryant, G. M. Hall, & RM Grounds. (2001). Effects of dexmedetomidine on adrenocortical function, and the cardiovascular, endocrine and inflammatory responses in post-operative patients needing sedation in the intensive care unit. British Journal of Anaesthesia. 86(5). 650–656. 164 indexed citations
13.
Venn, Richard, et al.. (2000). Respiratory effects of dexmedetomidine in the surgical patient requiring intensive care. Critical Care. 4(5). 302–8. 363 indexed citations
14.
Ball, Jonathan, et al.. (2000). Dexmedetomidine for sedation in the medical ICU. Critical Care. 4(Suppl 1). P192–P192. 1 indexed citations
15.
Venn, R.M., Chris Bradshaw, R.C. Spencer, et al.. (1999). Preliminary UK experience of dexmedetomidine, a novel agent for postoperative sedation in the intensive care unit. Anaesthesia. 54(12). 1136–1142. 409 indexed citations
16.
Redwood, Simon, et al.. (1996). Esmolol aids extubation in intensive care patient with ischaemic pulmonary oedema. Anaesthesia. 51(5). 474–477. 4 indexed citations
17.
Boyd, Owen, et al.. (1993). Comparison of clinical information gained from routine blood-gas analysis and from gastric tonometry for intramural pH. The Lancet. 341(8838). 142–146. 85 indexed citations
18.
Millane, T, Ed Bennett, & RM Grounds. (1992). Isoflurane and propofol for long‐term sedation in the intensive care unit. Anaesthesia. 47(9). 768–774. 51 indexed citations
19.
Grounds, RM, Michael K. Morgan, & Jean Lumley. (1985). Droga en la cárcel. PubMed. 61 Suppl 3(163). 24–5. 39 indexed citations
20.
Grounds, RM, et al.. (1985). The haemodynamic effects of intravenous induction. Anaesthesia. 40(8). 735–740. 183 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026