Philip Collins

867 citations
31 papers · 413 indexed · h-index 10
Topics
Migration, Policy, and Dickens Studies (10 papers)Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (4 papers)History, Medicine, and Leadership (3 papers)

In The Last Decade

Philip Collins

21 papers receiving 197 citations

Peers

Philip Collins
Comparison fields: 5 of 66
  • Literature and Literary Theory 144
  • Demography 102
  • Clinical Psychology 95
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 64
  • Sociology and Political Science 58
Replace Steven Marcus with:
Steven Marcus United States
Catherine Maxwell United Kingdom
Janet Oppenheim United States
Peter L. Rudnytsky United States
Moshé Idel Israel
G. W. Pigman United States
Jewel Spears Brooker United States
Marta Weigle United States
Élisabeth Roudinesco France
Suzann Bick
Philip Collins relative to Steven Marcus United States Steven Marcus's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.8×
Steven Marcus · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Philip Collins

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Philip Collins's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philip Collins with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philip Collins more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Philip Collins

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philip Collins. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philip Collins. The network helps show where Philip Collins may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Philip Collins

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Philip Collins. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Philip Collins based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Philip Collins. Philip Collins is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 30
2 17
3 21
4 1
5
The music of America
0
6
Tennyson : seven essays
3
7
Dickens and other Victorians : essays in honour of Philip Collins
4
8
Reducing the Teacher Workforce: A Management Perspective.
1
9
Dickens, interviews and recollections
6
10 16
11 180
12
Dickens: the critical heritage
47
13
Charles Dickens: The Critical Heritage
17
14 2
15 13
16 4
17 1
18 1
19 0
20 2

About Philip Collins

Philip Collins is a scholar working on Demography, History and Philosophy of Science and Literature and Literary Theory, having authored 31 papers that have together received 413 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Migration, Policy, and Dickens Studies (10 papers), Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (4 papers) and History, Medicine, and Leadership (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Literature and Literary Theory (144 citations), Demography (102 citations) and Clinical Psychology (95 citations). Philip Collins has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Charles Dickens, Kathleen Tillotson, Susan Young, Peter Misch, Gisli H. Gudjónsson, David Sperlinger, Emily J. Goodwin, Joanne Shattock, Thomas W. White and Aarón Copland. Their work appears in journals such as British Journal of Educational Studies, The Modern Language Review and Child and Adolescent Mental Health.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026