Philip Broemer

826 total citations
17 papers, 578 citations indexed

About

Philip Broemer is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Philip Broemer has authored 17 papers receiving a total of 578 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 12 papers in Social Psychology, 11 papers in Sociology and Political Science and 8 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology. Recurrent topics in Philip Broemer's work include Social and Intergroup Psychology (11 papers), Cultural Differences and Values (7 papers) and Behavioral Health and Interventions (5 papers). Philip Broemer is often cited by papers focused on Social and Intergroup Psychology (11 papers), Cultural Differences and Values (7 papers) and Behavioral Health and Interventions (5 papers). Philip Broemer collaborates with scholars based in Germany, United Kingdom and Poland. Philip Broemer's co-authors include Michael Diehl, Jochen E. Gebauer, Klaus Jonas, Gregory R. Maio, Michael Riketta, Geoffrey Haddock and Ulrich von Hecker and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin and Journal of Experimental Social Psychology.

In The Last Decade

Philip Broemer

17 papers receiving 547 citations

Peers

Philip Broemer
Comparison fields: 5 of 79
  • Sociology and Political Science 281
  • Social Psychology 261
  • Applied Psychology 170
  • Clinical Psychology 93
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 93
Amy N. Dalton Hong Kong
Leigh Ann Vaughn United States
James F. M. Cornwell United States
Dirk Smeesters Netherlands
Lisbeth Ku Macao
Alberto Becerra Spain
Sointu Leikas Finland
Anne L. Zell United States
Tamara Towles-Schwen United States
Marina Chernikova United States
Amy N. Dalton Hong Kong View profile →
Citations per field, relative to Philip Broemer
Philip Broemer · 1×
Citations per year, relative to Philip Broemer
Philip Broemer · 1×

Countries citing papers authored by Philip Broemer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Philip Broemer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philip Broemer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philip Broemer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Philip Broemer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philip Broemer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philip Broemer. The network helps show where Philip Broemer may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Philip Broemer

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Philip Broemer. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Philip Broemer based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Philip Broemer. Philip Broemer is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
# Work Indexed citations
1 4
2 1
3 8
4 26
5 79
6 106
7 32
8 54
9 5
10 11
11 17
12 15
13 56
14 11
15 128
16 5
17 20

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026