Philip Broemer

826 total citations
17 papers, 578 citations indexed

About

Philip Broemer is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Philip Broemer has authored 17 papers receiving a total of 578 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 12 papers in Social Psychology, 11 papers in Sociology and Political Science and 8 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology. Recurrent topics in Philip Broemer's work include Social and Intergroup Psychology (11 papers), Cultural Differences and Values (7 papers) and Behavioral Health and Interventions (5 papers). Philip Broemer is often cited by papers focused on Social and Intergroup Psychology (11 papers), Cultural Differences and Values (7 papers) and Behavioral Health and Interventions (5 papers). Philip Broemer collaborates with scholars based in Germany, United Kingdom and Poland. Philip Broemer's co-authors include Michael Diehl, Jochen E. Gebauer, Klaus Jonas, Gregory R. Maio, Michael Riketta, Geoffrey Haddock and Ulrich von Hecker and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin and Journal of Experimental Social Psychology.

In The Last Decade

Philip Broemer

17 papers receiving 547 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Philip Broemer Germany 12 281 261 170 93 93 17 578
Amy N. Dalton Hong Kong 9 271 1.0× 300 1.1× 270 1.6× 65 0.7× 127 1.4× 18 668
Leigh Ann Vaughn United States 13 468 1.7× 381 1.5× 255 1.5× 75 0.8× 90 1.0× 35 819
James F. M. Cornwell United States 14 209 0.7× 160 0.6× 188 1.1× 44 0.5× 82 0.9× 34 545
Dirk Smeesters Netherlands 12 263 0.9× 404 1.5× 144 0.8× 100 1.1× 66 0.7× 29 725
Lisbeth Ku Macao 13 358 1.3× 173 0.7× 139 0.8× 165 1.8× 79 0.8× 21 685
Alberto Becerra Spain 8 249 0.9× 231 0.9× 80 0.5× 57 0.6× 61 0.7× 14 459
Sointu Leikas Finland 15 321 1.1× 313 1.2× 130 0.8× 266 2.9× 143 1.5× 37 797
Anne L. Zell United States 11 226 0.8× 246 0.9× 125 0.7× 187 2.0× 89 1.0× 13 517
Tamara Towles-Schwen United States 6 389 1.4× 253 1.0× 126 0.7× 34 0.4× 62 0.7× 6 519
Marina Chernikova United States 11 389 1.4× 273 1.0× 133 0.8× 117 1.3× 73 0.8× 24 687

Countries citing papers authored by Philip Broemer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Philip Broemer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philip Broemer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philip Broemer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Philip Broemer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philip Broemer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philip Broemer. The network helps show where Philip Broemer may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Philip Broemer

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Philip Broemer. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Philip Broemer based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Philip Broemer. Philip Broemer is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
1.
Broemer, Philip, et al.. (2015). Temporal Self-Extension: Implications for Temporal Comparison and Autobiographical Memory. Polish Psychological Bulletin. 46(2). 246–261. 4 indexed citations
2.
Broemer, Philip, et al.. (2014). You never compare alone: How social consensus and comparative context affect self-evaluation. Polish Psychological Bulletin. 45(2). 156–166. 1 indexed citations
3.
Gebauer, Jochen E., Geoffrey Haddock, Philip Broemer, & Ulrich von Hecker. (2013). The role of semantic self-perceptions in temporal distance perceptions toward autobiographical events: The semantic congruence model.. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 105(5). 852–872. 8 indexed citations
4.
Gebauer, Jochen E., Philip Broemer, Geoffrey Haddock, & Ulrich von Hecker. (2008). Inclusion-exclusion of positive and negative past selves: Mood congruence as information.. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 95(2). 470–487. 26 indexed citations
5.
Gebauer, Jochen E., Michael Riketta, Philip Broemer, & Gregory R. Maio. (2008). “How much do you like your name?” An implicit measure of global self-esteem. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 44(5). 1346–1354. 79 indexed citations
6.
Gebauer, Jochen E., Michael Riketta, Philip Broemer, & Gregory R. Maio. (2007). Pleasure and pressure based prosocial motivation: Divergent relations to subjective well-being. Journal of Research in Personality. 42(2). 399–420. 106 indexed citations
7.
Broemer, Philip, et al.. (2007). How temporal distance from past selves influences self‐perception. European Journal of Social Psychology. 38(4). 697–714. 32 indexed citations
8.
Broemer, Philip. (2004). Ease of imagination moderates reactions to differently framed health messages. European Journal of Social Psychology. 34(2). 103–119. 54 indexed citations
9.
Broemer, Philip & Michael Diehl. (2004). Evaluative contrast in social comparison: the role of distinct and shared features of the self and comparison others. European Journal of Social Psychology. 34(1). 25–38. 5 indexed citations
10.
Broemer, Philip, et al.. (2003). Self‐views in close relationships: The influence of attachment styles. British Journal of Social Psychology. 42(3). 445–460. 11 indexed citations
11.
Broemer, Philip & Michael Diehl. (2003). Romantic jealousy as a social comparison outcome: When similarity stings. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 40(3). 393–400. 17 indexed citations
12.
Broemer, Philip & Michael Diehl. (2003). What You Think is What You Get: Comparative Evaluations of Close Relationships. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 29(12). 1560–1569. 15 indexed citations
13.
Broemer, Philip. (2002). Relative effectiveness of differently framed health messages: the influence of ambivalence. European Journal of Social Psychology. 32(5). 685–703. 56 indexed citations
14.
Broemer, Philip. (2001). Ease of Recall Moderates the Impact of Relationship-Related Goals on Judgments of Interpersonal Closeness. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 37(3). 261–266. 11 indexed citations
15.
Jonas, Klaus, Philip Broemer, & Michael Diehl. (2000). Attitudinal Ambivalence. European Review of Social Psychology. 11(1). 35–74. 128 indexed citations
16.
17.
Jonas, Klaus, Philip Broemer, & Michael Diehl. (2000). Experienced Ambivalence as a Moderator of the Consistency Between Attitudes and Behaviors. Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich). 31(3). 153–165. 20 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Amy N. Dalton Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Leigh Ann Vaughn Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by James F. M. Cornwell Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Dirk Smeesters Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Lisbeth Ku Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Alberto Becerra Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Sointu Leikas Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Anne L. Zell Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Tamara Towles-Schwen Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Marina Chernikova
Rankless by CCL
2026