Philip B. Hamm

2.5k total citations
86 papers, 2.1k citations indexed

About

Philip B. Hamm is a scholar working on Plant Science, Cell Biology and Molecular Biology. According to data from OpenAlex, Philip B. Hamm has authored 86 papers receiving a total of 2.1k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 77 papers in Plant Science, 23 papers in Cell Biology and 12 papers in Molecular Biology. Recurrent topics in Philip B. Hamm's work include Plant Pathogens and Resistance (43 papers), Plant Disease Resistance and Genetics (33 papers) and Plant Virus Research Studies (26 papers). Philip B. Hamm is often cited by papers focused on Plant Pathogens and Resistance (43 papers), Plant Disease Resistance and Genetics (33 papers) and Plant Virus Research Studies (26 papers). Philip B. Hamm collaborates with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Denmark. Philip B. Hamm's co-authors include Dennis A. Johnson, Everett M. Hansen, Jeffrey S. Miller, D. C. Hane, J. M. Crosslin, C. M. Brasier, Joseph E. Munyaneza, Silvia I. Rondon, Andrew S. Jensen and D. S. Shaw and has published in prestigious journals such as Phytopathology, Canadian Journal of Forest Research and Biology and Fertility of Soils.

In The Last Decade

Philip B. Hamm

85 papers receiving 1.9k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Philip B. Hamm United States 26 1.9k 600 406 230 188 86 2.1k
Antonio Vicent Civera Spain 20 1.2k 0.6× 684 1.1× 230 0.6× 249 1.1× 82 0.4× 131 1.5k
D. M. Benson United States 23 2.5k 1.3× 1.5k 2.4× 891 2.2× 85 0.4× 94 0.5× 76 2.7k
Richard C. Pratt United States 22 1.6k 0.8× 159 0.3× 398 1.0× 162 0.7× 103 0.5× 68 2.0k
B. Hau Germany 20 1.2k 0.6× 388 0.6× 140 0.3× 194 0.8× 43 0.2× 67 1.4k
Kurt Heungens Belgium 24 1.8k 0.9× 1.1k 1.8× 829 2.0× 316 1.4× 83 0.4× 72 2.1k
Peter V. Oudemans United States 22 1.2k 0.6× 751 1.3× 496 1.2× 70 0.3× 52 0.3× 54 1.4k
James M. Bradeen United States 25 2.2k 1.2× 353 0.6× 722 1.8× 61 0.3× 323 1.7× 69 2.6k
B. L. Shearer Australia 27 2.2k 1.1× 1.2k 2.1× 734 1.8× 90 0.4× 77 0.4× 102 2.5k
P. J. Keane Australia 24 2.6k 1.4× 1.5k 2.5× 837 2.1× 115 0.5× 85 0.5× 90 3.1k
Paolo Capretti Italy 27 1.5k 0.8× 1.3k 2.1× 570 1.4× 489 2.1× 188 1.0× 118 2.4k

Countries citing papers authored by Philip B. Hamm

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Philip B. Hamm's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philip B. Hamm with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philip B. Hamm more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Philip B. Hamm

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philip B. Hamm. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philip B. Hamm. The network helps show where Philip B. Hamm may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Philip B. Hamm

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Philip B. Hamm. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Philip B. Hamm based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Philip B. Hamm. Philip B. Hamm is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Dung, Jeremiah K. S., et al.. (2020). Molecular and Alkaloid Characterization of Claviceps purpurea Sensu Lato From Grass Seed Production Areas of the U.S. Pacific Northwest. Phytopathology. 111(5). 831–841. 2 indexed citations
2.
Berlin, Sofia, Mogens Nicolaisen, Steen Lykke Nielsen, et al.. (2015). Diversity and evolution of potato mop-top virus. Archives of Virology. 160(5). 1345–1351. 16 indexed citations
3.
Dung, Jeremiah K. S., et al.. (2012). Incidence and Impact of Verticillium dahliae in Soil Associated with Certified Potato Seed Lots. Phytopathology. 103(1). 55–63. 19 indexed citations
4.
Hamm, Philip B., et al.. (2011). Common Smut Reduces Sweet Corn Yield and Ear Processing Quality. HortScience. 46(11). 1507–1511. 2 indexed citations
5.
Kaiser, C., et al.. (2011). In Vitro Fungicidal Activity of Calcium and Potassium Salts on Several Commercially Significant Plant Pathogens. HortScience. 46(6). 913–916. 5 indexed citations
6.
Crosslin, J. M., et al.. (2011). First Report of Zebra Chip Disease and “Candidatus Liberibacter solanacearum” on Potatoes in Oregon and Washington State. Plant Disease. 96(3). 452–452. 75 indexed citations
7.
Crosslin, James M., Philip B. Hamm, W. W. Kirk, & Rosemarie W. Hammond. (2010). Complete genomic sequence of a Tobacco rattle virus isolate from Michigan-grown potatoes. Archives of Virology. 155(4). 621–625. 13 indexed citations
8.
DeBano, Sandra J., et al.. (2010). Spatial and Temporal Dynamics of Potato Tuberworm (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae) in the Columbia Basin of the Pacific Northwest. Environmental Entomology. 39(1). 1–14. 21 indexed citations
9.
Brown, Charles R., H. Mojtahedi, J. M. Crosslin, et al.. (2009). Characterization of Resistance to Corky Ringspot Disease in Potato: A Case for Resistance to Infection by Tobacco Rattle Virus. American Journal of Potato Research. 86(1). 49–55. 9 indexed citations
11.
Ocamb, Cynthia M., Philip B. Hamm, & Dennis A. Johnson. (2007). Benzimidazole resistance offusarium species recovered from potatoes with dry rot from storages located in the Columbia basin of oregon and Washington. American Journal of Potato Research. 84(2). 169–177. 34 indexed citations
13.
Lorenzen, Jim, et al.. (2006). Whole genome characterization of Potato virus Y isolates collected in the western USA and their comparison to isolates from Europe and Canada. Archives of Virology. 151(6). 1055–1074. 111 indexed citations
14.
Crosslin, J. M., Joseph E. Munyaneza, Andrew S. Jensen, & Philip B. Hamm. (2005). Association of Beet Leafhopper (Hemiptera: Cicadellidae) with a Clover Proliferation Group Phytoplasma in Columbia Basin of Washington and Oregon. Journal of Economic Entomology. 98(2). 279–283. 35 indexed citations
15.
Crosslin, J. M., et al.. (2005). Serological and molecular detection of tobacco veinal necrosis isolates ofPotato virus Y (PVYN) from potatoes grown in the Western United States. American Journal of Potato Research. 82(4). 263–269. 31 indexed citations
16.
Geary, Brad, Philip B. Hamm, & Dennis A. Johnson. (2004). Deposition and redistribution of fungicides applied by air and chemigation for control of late blight in commercial potato fields. American Journal of Potato Research. 81(5). 305–315. 7 indexed citations
17.
Smart, Christine D., Robert W. Sandrock, Jeffrey S. Miller, et al.. (2000). Implications of Sexual Reproduction for Phytophthora infestans in the United States: Generation of an Aggressive Lineage. Plant Disease. 84(7). 731–735. 111 indexed citations
19.
Johnson, Dennis A., J. Richard Alldredge, & Philip B. Hamm. (1998). Expansion of Potato Late Blight Forecasting Models for the Columbia Basin of Washington and Oregon. Plant Disease. 82(6). 642–645. 26 indexed citations
20.
Hamm, Philip B., et al.. (1985). Phytophthora cryptogea and P. drechsleri associated with root-rotted Douglas-fir seedlings in British Columbia.. Plant Disease. 69(4). 5 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026