Biology and Fertility of Soils

4.3k papers and 185.4k indexed citations i.

About

The 4.3k papers published in Biology and Fertility of Soils in the last decades have received a total of 185.4k indexed citations. Papers published in Biology and Fertility of Soils usually cover Soil Science (2.4k papers), Plant Science (1.8k papers) and Environmental Chemistry (997 papers) specifically the topics of Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics (2.3k papers), Soil and Water Nutrient Dynamics (842 papers) and Legume Nitrogen Fixing Symbiosis (643 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Biology and Fertility of Soils are L. Zelles, Ellen Kandeler, E. B��th, M. A. Tabatabai, Johannes Lehmann, Rainer Georg Joergensen, H. R. Gerber, Yakov Kuzyakov, G. W. Yeates and Wolfgang Zech.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Biology and Fertility of Soils

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Biology and Fertility of Soils. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Biology and Fertility of Soils.

Countries where authors publish in Biology and Fertility of Soils

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Biology and Fertility of Soils. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Biology and Fertility of Soils with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Biology and Fertility of Soils more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025